Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = 0.5 * weight - 5
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses 0.5 positions in the result.
Baugnies
1
69 kgMarcato
2
67 kgDe Bie
3
65 kgLammertink
4
61 kgNaesen
5
74 kgBenoot
6
72 kgBille
7
67 kgSchorn
8
72 kgRuijgh
9
64 kgDuijn
10
73 kgMeijers
11
68 kgSprengers
12
60 kgLaengen
13
79 kgLeukemans
14
67 kgBreen
15
74 kgSchillinger
16
72 kgThwaites
17
71 kgStallaert
18
72 kgCoenen
19
69 kgDegreve
20
72 kgMeurisse
21
68 kgHabeaux
22
68 kgRiesebeek
23
78 kgJacobs
24
68 kgPeyskens
26
69 kgBroeckx
27
73 kgTerpstra
28
64 kgVanendert
29
64 kgGmelich Meijling
30
77 kgJensen
31
67 kgNaesen
36
72 kgDe Rooze
37
62 kgvan Empel
39
64 kgMullen
42
77 kgDeclercq
44
78 kgAsselman
45
69 kgBoroš
46
69 kgHonig
48
61 kgPolitt
49
80 kgMatzka
51
69 kgMertz
53
70 kgArchbold
54
79 kgLigthart
55
72 kgKreder
56
67 kgVan Hecke
57
69 kgWalsleben
59
66 kgJanssens
60
74 kgVervaeke
61
68 kg
1
69 kgMarcato
2
67 kgDe Bie
3
65 kgLammertink
4
61 kgNaesen
5
74 kgBenoot
6
72 kgBille
7
67 kgSchorn
8
72 kgRuijgh
9
64 kgDuijn
10
73 kgMeijers
11
68 kgSprengers
12
60 kgLaengen
13
79 kgLeukemans
14
67 kgBreen
15
74 kgSchillinger
16
72 kgThwaites
17
71 kgStallaert
18
72 kgCoenen
19
69 kgDegreve
20
72 kgMeurisse
21
68 kgHabeaux
22
68 kgRiesebeek
23
78 kgJacobs
24
68 kgPeyskens
26
69 kgBroeckx
27
73 kgTerpstra
28
64 kgVanendert
29
64 kgGmelich Meijling
30
77 kgJensen
31
67 kgNaesen
36
72 kgDe Rooze
37
62 kgvan Empel
39
64 kgMullen
42
77 kgDeclercq
44
78 kgAsselman
45
69 kgBoroš
46
69 kgHonig
48
61 kgPolitt
49
80 kgMatzka
51
69 kgMertz
53
70 kgArchbold
54
79 kgLigthart
55
72 kgKreder
56
67 kgVan Hecke
57
69 kgWalsleben
59
66 kgJanssens
60
74 kgVervaeke
61
68 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
80
60
1
61
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | BAUGNIES Jérôme | 69 |
| 2 | MARCATO Marco | 67 |
| 3 | DE BIE Sean | 65 |
| 4 | LAMMERTINK Maurits | 61 |
| 5 | NAESEN Oliver | 74 |
| 6 | BENOOT Tiesj | 72 |
| 7 | BILLE Gaëtan | 67 |
| 8 | SCHORN Daniel | 72 |
| 9 | RUIJGH Rob | 64 |
| 10 | DUIJN Huub | 73 |
| 11 | MEIJERS Jeroen | 68 |
| 12 | SPRENGERS Thomas | 60 |
| 13 | LAENGEN Vegard Stake | 79 |
| 14 | LEUKEMANS Björn | 67 |
| 15 | BREEN Vegard | 74 |
| 16 | SCHILLINGER Andreas | 72 |
| 17 | THWAITES Scott | 71 |
| 18 | STALLAERT Joeri | 72 |
| 19 | COENEN Dennis | 69 |
| 20 | DEGREVE Martijn | 72 |
| 21 | MEURISSE Xandro | 68 |
| 22 | HABEAUX Grégory | 68 |
| 23 | RIESEBEEK Oscar | 78 |
| 24 | JACOBS Pieter | 68 |
| 26 | PEYSKENS Dimitri | 69 |
| 27 | BROECKX Stig | 73 |
| 28 | TERPSTRA Mike | 64 |
| 29 | VANENDERT Dennis | 64 |
| 30 | GMELICH MEIJLING Jarno | 77 |
| 31 | JENSEN August | 67 |
| 36 | NAESEN Lawrence | 72 |
| 37 | DE ROOZE Niels | 62 |
| 39 | VAN EMPEL Etienne | 64 |
| 42 | MULLEN Ryan | 77 |
| 44 | DECLERCQ Tim | 78 |
| 45 | ASSELMAN Jesper | 69 |
| 46 | BOROŠ Michael | 69 |
| 48 | HONIG Reinier | 61 |
| 49 | POLITT Nils | 80 |
| 51 | MATZKA Ralf | 69 |
| 53 | MERTZ Rémy | 70 |
| 54 | ARCHBOLD Shane | 79 |
| 55 | LIGTHART Pim | 72 |
| 56 | KREDER Michel | 67 |
| 57 | VAN HECKE Preben | 69 |
| 59 | WALSLEBEN Philipp | 66 |
| 60 | JANSSENS Jimmy | 74 |
| 61 | VERVAEKE Louis | 68 |