Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -1 * weight + 106
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -1 positions in the result.
Vos
1
58 kgTeutenberg
2
64 kgWild
3
75 kgBronzini
4
54 kgGilmore
5
56 kgOlds
7
54 kgDe Vocht
8
61 kgJohansson
9
58 kgAndruk
10
56 kgSmall
11
55 kgvan Vleuten
12
59 kgArys
16
60 kgvan Dijk
19
71 kgKirchmann
20
59 kgMoberg
21
56 kgMartin
23
57 kgMustonen
24
58 kgBurchenkova
26
67 kgVisser
27
59 kgHannes
28
51 kgFahlin
31
63 kgWilleit
33
54 kgBecker
34
64 kgKessler
36
60 kgGunnewijk
42
67 kgGuarischi
47
57 kgSlappendel
50
67 kgBrand
56
57 kgGuarnier
58
54 kgKiesanowski
59
56 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
61
64 kgZabelinskaya
63
52 kgLaws
69
54 kgLichtenberg
72
52 kgAntoshina
77
55 kgHatteland Lima
87
65 kgStevens
90
55 kgBoyarskaya
92
67 kgCantele
93
58 kgde Baat
99
56 kgRiabchenko
105
57 kgVžesniauskaitė
108
57 kgPieters
112
58 kgVekemans
116
52 kgTrott
139
56 kgNumainville
144
65 kg
1
58 kgTeutenberg
2
64 kgWild
3
75 kgBronzini
4
54 kgGilmore
5
56 kgOlds
7
54 kgDe Vocht
8
61 kgJohansson
9
58 kgAndruk
10
56 kgSmall
11
55 kgvan Vleuten
12
59 kgArys
16
60 kgvan Dijk
19
71 kgKirchmann
20
59 kgMoberg
21
56 kgMartin
23
57 kgMustonen
24
58 kgBurchenkova
26
67 kgVisser
27
59 kgHannes
28
51 kgFahlin
31
63 kgWilleit
33
54 kgBecker
34
64 kgKessler
36
60 kgGunnewijk
42
67 kgGuarischi
47
57 kgSlappendel
50
67 kgBrand
56
57 kgGuarnier
58
54 kgKiesanowski
59
56 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
61
64 kgZabelinskaya
63
52 kgLaws
69
54 kgLichtenberg
72
52 kgAntoshina
77
55 kgHatteland Lima
87
65 kgStevens
90
55 kgBoyarskaya
92
67 kgCantele
93
58 kgde Baat
99
56 kgRiabchenko
105
57 kgVžesniauskaitė
108
57 kgPieters
112
58 kgVekemans
116
52 kgTrott
139
56 kgNumainville
144
65 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
75
51
1
144
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | VOS Marianne | 58 |
| 2 | TEUTENBERG Ina-Yoko | 64 |
| 3 | WILD Kirsten | 75 |
| 4 | BRONZINI Giorgia | 54 |
| 5 | GILMORE Rochelle | 56 |
| 7 | OLDS Shelley | 54 |
| 8 | DE VOCHT Liesbet | 61 |
| 9 | JOHANSSON Emma | 58 |
| 10 | ANDRUK Alona | 56 |
| 11 | SMALL Carmen | 55 |
| 12 | VAN VLEUTEN Annemiek | 59 |
| 16 | ARYS Evelyn | 60 |
| 19 | VAN DIJK Ellen | 71 |
| 20 | KIRCHMANN Leah | 59 |
| 21 | MOBERG Emilie | 56 |
| 23 | MARTIN Lucy | 57 |
| 24 | MUSTONEN Sara | 58 |
| 26 | BURCHENKOVA Alexandra | 67 |
| 27 | VISSER Adrie | 59 |
| 28 | HANNES Kaat | 51 |
| 31 | FAHLIN Emilia | 63 |
| 33 | WILLEIT Cherise | 54 |
| 34 | BECKER Charlotte | 64 |
| 36 | KESSLER Nina | 60 |
| 42 | GUNNEWIJK Loes | 67 |
| 47 | GUARISCHI Barbara | 57 |
| 50 | SLAPPENDEL Iris | 67 |
| 56 | BRAND Lucinda | 57 |
| 58 | GUARNIER Megan | 54 |
| 59 | KIESANOWSKI Joanne | 56 |
| 61 | VAN DEN BROEK-BLAAK Chantal | 64 |
| 63 | ZABELINSKAYA Olga | 52 |
| 69 | LAWS Sharon | 54 |
| 72 | LICHTENBERG Claudia | 52 |
| 77 | ANTOSHINA Tatiana | 55 |
| 87 | HATTELAND LIMA Tone | 65 |
| 90 | STEVENS Evelyn | 55 |
| 92 | BOYARSKAYA Natalia | 67 |
| 93 | CANTELE Noemi | 58 |
| 99 | DE BAAT Kim | 56 |
| 105 | RIABCHENKO Tetyana | 57 |
| 108 | VŽESNIAUSKAITĖ Modesta | 57 |
| 112 | PIETERS Amy | 58 |
| 116 | VEKEMANS Anisha | 52 |
| 139 | TROTT Laura | 56 |
| 144 | NUMAINVILLE Joëlle | 65 |