Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -2 * weight + 161
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -2 positions in the result.
Armstrong
1
58 kgHughes
2
72 kgVos
3
58 kgvan Dijk
4
71 kgArndt
5
59 kgTeutenberg
6
64 kgGunnewijk
7
67 kgStevens
8
55 kgMarche
11
58 kgvan Vleuten
13
59 kgZabelinskaya
14
52 kgSlappendel
15
67 kgKupfernagel
16
68 kgGuarnier
17
54 kgWild
18
75 kgNumainville
19
65 kgDeignan
21
57 kgRamsden
22
62 kgSmall
25
55 kgMiller
26
52 kgNeylan
28
52 kgBoyarskaya
29
67 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
31
64 kgFahlin
32
63 kgArys
36
60 kgvan der Breggen
37
56 kgVisser
38
59 kgPieters
39
58 kgElvin
46
63 kgRooijakkers
47
58 kgAntoshina
49
55 kgCooke
53
58 kgAllen
54
55 kgGrassi
58
56 kgNorman Leth
59
68 kgKitchen
61
60 kgEnsing
62
62 kgKasper
63
59 kgKirchmann
68
59 kgDuyck
78
60 kgHanselmann
83
55 kgHannes
94
51 kgMartin
103
57 kgHohl
118
55 kgGilmore
148
56 kg
1
58 kgHughes
2
72 kgVos
3
58 kgvan Dijk
4
71 kgArndt
5
59 kgTeutenberg
6
64 kgGunnewijk
7
67 kgStevens
8
55 kgMarche
11
58 kgvan Vleuten
13
59 kgZabelinskaya
14
52 kgSlappendel
15
67 kgKupfernagel
16
68 kgGuarnier
17
54 kgWild
18
75 kgNumainville
19
65 kgDeignan
21
57 kgRamsden
22
62 kgSmall
25
55 kgMiller
26
52 kgNeylan
28
52 kgBoyarskaya
29
67 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
31
64 kgFahlin
32
63 kgArys
36
60 kgvan der Breggen
37
56 kgVisser
38
59 kgPieters
39
58 kgElvin
46
63 kgRooijakkers
47
58 kgAntoshina
49
55 kgCooke
53
58 kgAllen
54
55 kgGrassi
58
56 kgNorman Leth
59
68 kgKitchen
61
60 kgEnsing
62
62 kgKasper
63
59 kgKirchmann
68
59 kgDuyck
78
60 kgHanselmann
83
55 kgHannes
94
51 kgMartin
103
57 kgHohl
118
55 kgGilmore
148
56 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
75
51
1
148
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ARMSTRONG Kristin | 58 |
| 2 | HUGHES Clara | 72 |
| 3 | VOS Marianne | 58 |
| 4 | VAN DIJK Ellen | 71 |
| 5 | ARNDT Judith | 59 |
| 6 | TEUTENBERG Ina-Yoko | 64 |
| 7 | GUNNEWIJK Loes | 67 |
| 8 | STEVENS Evelyn | 55 |
| 11 | MARCHE Shara | 58 |
| 13 | VAN VLEUTEN Annemiek | 59 |
| 14 | ZABELINSKAYA Olga | 52 |
| 15 | SLAPPENDEL Iris | 67 |
| 16 | KUPFERNAGEL Hanka | 68 |
| 17 | GUARNIER Megan | 54 |
| 18 | WILD Kirsten | 75 |
| 19 | NUMAINVILLE Joëlle | 65 |
| 21 | DEIGNAN Elizabeth | 57 |
| 22 | RAMSDEN Denise | 62 |
| 25 | SMALL Carmen | 55 |
| 26 | MILLER Amanda | 52 |
| 28 | NEYLAN Rachel | 52 |
| 29 | BOYARSKAYA Natalia | 67 |
| 31 | VAN DEN BROEK-BLAAK Chantal | 64 |
| 32 | FAHLIN Emilia | 63 |
| 36 | ARYS Evelyn | 60 |
| 37 | VAN DER BREGGEN Anna | 56 |
| 38 | VISSER Adrie | 59 |
| 39 | PIETERS Amy | 58 |
| 46 | ELVIN Gracie | 63 |
| 47 | ROOIJAKKERS Pauliena | 58 |
| 49 | ANTOSHINA Tatiana | 55 |
| 53 | COOKE Nicole | 58 |
| 54 | ALLEN Jessica | 55 |
| 58 | GRASSI Giuseppina | 56 |
| 59 | NORMAN LETH Julie | 68 |
| 61 | KITCHEN Lauren | 60 |
| 62 | ENSING Janneke | 62 |
| 63 | KASPER Romy | 59 |
| 68 | KIRCHMANN Leah | 59 |
| 78 | DUYCK Ann-Sophie | 60 |
| 83 | HANSELMANN Nicole | 55 |
| 94 | HANNES Kaat | 51 |
| 103 | MARTIN Lucy | 57 |
| 118 | HOHL Jennifer | 55 |
| 148 | GILMORE Rochelle | 56 |