Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -1.2 * weight + 117
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -1.2 positions in the result.
Wild
1
75 kgTeutenberg
2
64 kgVos
3
58 kgArndt
4
59 kgvan Dijk
5
71 kgVisser
6
59 kgKasper
7
59 kgGunnewijk
8
67 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
9
64 kgSlappendel
11
67 kgArys
12
60 kgGilmore
13
56 kgGuarnier
15
54 kgPieters
18
58 kgAllen
21
55 kgMartin
24
57 kgHannes
25
51 kgvan der Breggen
27
56 kgNorman Leth
33
68 kgHughes
40
72 kgCooke
44
58 kgFahlin
46
63 kgDeignan
47
57 kgvan Vleuten
48
59 kgMarche
49
58 kgElvin
53
63 kgZabelinskaya
56
52 kgHohl
66
55 kgKitchen
71
60 kgKirchmann
72
59 kgAntoshina
74
55 kgGrassi
76
56 kgMiller
77
52 kgArmstrong
80
58 kgStevens
81
55 kgNumainville
83
65 kgNeylan
88
52 kgRooijakkers
90
58 kgRamsden
91
62 kgEnsing
114
62 kgBoyarskaya
116
67 kg
1
75 kgTeutenberg
2
64 kgVos
3
58 kgArndt
4
59 kgvan Dijk
5
71 kgVisser
6
59 kgKasper
7
59 kgGunnewijk
8
67 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
9
64 kgSlappendel
11
67 kgArys
12
60 kgGilmore
13
56 kgGuarnier
15
54 kgPieters
18
58 kgAllen
21
55 kgMartin
24
57 kgHannes
25
51 kgvan der Breggen
27
56 kgNorman Leth
33
68 kgHughes
40
72 kgCooke
44
58 kgFahlin
46
63 kgDeignan
47
57 kgvan Vleuten
48
59 kgMarche
49
58 kgElvin
53
63 kgZabelinskaya
56
52 kgHohl
66
55 kgKitchen
71
60 kgKirchmann
72
59 kgAntoshina
74
55 kgGrassi
76
56 kgMiller
77
52 kgArmstrong
80
58 kgStevens
81
55 kgNumainville
83
65 kgNeylan
88
52 kgRooijakkers
90
58 kgRamsden
91
62 kgEnsing
114
62 kgBoyarskaya
116
67 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
75
51
1
116
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | WILD Kirsten | 75 |
| 2 | TEUTENBERG Ina-Yoko | 64 |
| 3 | VOS Marianne | 58 |
| 4 | ARNDT Judith | 59 |
| 5 | VAN DIJK Ellen | 71 |
| 6 | VISSER Adrie | 59 |
| 7 | KASPER Romy | 59 |
| 8 | GUNNEWIJK Loes | 67 |
| 9 | VAN DEN BROEK-BLAAK Chantal | 64 |
| 11 | SLAPPENDEL Iris | 67 |
| 12 | ARYS Evelyn | 60 |
| 13 | GILMORE Rochelle | 56 |
| 15 | GUARNIER Megan | 54 |
| 18 | PIETERS Amy | 58 |
| 21 | ALLEN Jessica | 55 |
| 24 | MARTIN Lucy | 57 |
| 25 | HANNES Kaat | 51 |
| 27 | VAN DER BREGGEN Anna | 56 |
| 33 | NORMAN LETH Julie | 68 |
| 40 | HUGHES Clara | 72 |
| 44 | COOKE Nicole | 58 |
| 46 | FAHLIN Emilia | 63 |
| 47 | DEIGNAN Elizabeth | 57 |
| 48 | VAN VLEUTEN Annemiek | 59 |
| 49 | MARCHE Shara | 58 |
| 53 | ELVIN Gracie | 63 |
| 56 | ZABELINSKAYA Olga | 52 |
| 66 | HOHL Jennifer | 55 |
| 71 | KITCHEN Lauren | 60 |
| 72 | KIRCHMANN Leah | 59 |
| 74 | ANTOSHINA Tatiana | 55 |
| 76 | GRASSI Giuseppina | 56 |
| 77 | MILLER Amanda | 52 |
| 80 | ARMSTRONG Kristin | 58 |
| 81 | STEVENS Evelyn | 55 |
| 83 | NUMAINVILLE Joëlle | 65 |
| 88 | NEYLAN Rachel | 52 |
| 90 | ROOIJAKKERS Pauliena | 58 |
| 91 | RAMSDEN Denise | 62 |
| 114 | ENSING Janneke | 62 |
| 116 | BOYARSKAYA Natalia | 67 |