Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -0.4 * weight + 64
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -0.4 positions in the result.
Wild
1
75 kgvan Dijk
2
71 kgSlappendel
3
67 kgGunnewijk
4
67 kgVisser
5
59 kgvan der Breggen
6
56 kgBrennauer
7
63 kgvan Vleuten
8
59 kgMajerus
9
56 kgRowe
10
65 kgKitchen
13
60 kgArys
14
60 kgBrand
15
57 kgAntoshina
16
55 kgTrott
17
56 kgElvin
19
63 kgDeignan
20
57 kgSmall
21
55 kgPolspoel
23
59 kgD'hoore
24
63 kgKoster
25
56 kgEdmondson
26
66 kgGuarnier
29
54 kgPieters
30
58 kgMoberg
31
56 kgNeff
32
53 kgMarche
35
58 kgBecker
36
64 kgHosking
38
60 kgKessler
39
60 kgGu
41
55 kgDruyts
44
62 kgLechner
45
52 kgSiggaard
48
67 kgGuderzo
49
54 kgde Vries
51
62 kgTenniglo
55
64 kgMarkus
56
61 kgGilmore
58
56 kgKasper
63
59 kgScandolara
67
52 kgKröger
76
77 kgMartin
80
57 kgFahlin
93
63 kgEdwards
105
59 kgHanselmann
108
55 kgSchneitter
109
59 kgHatteland Lima
118
65 kg
1
75 kgvan Dijk
2
71 kgSlappendel
3
67 kgGunnewijk
4
67 kgVisser
5
59 kgvan der Breggen
6
56 kgBrennauer
7
63 kgvan Vleuten
8
59 kgMajerus
9
56 kgRowe
10
65 kgKitchen
13
60 kgArys
14
60 kgBrand
15
57 kgAntoshina
16
55 kgTrott
17
56 kgElvin
19
63 kgDeignan
20
57 kgSmall
21
55 kgPolspoel
23
59 kgD'hoore
24
63 kgKoster
25
56 kgEdmondson
26
66 kgGuarnier
29
54 kgPieters
30
58 kgMoberg
31
56 kgNeff
32
53 kgMarche
35
58 kgBecker
36
64 kgHosking
38
60 kgKessler
39
60 kgGu
41
55 kgDruyts
44
62 kgLechner
45
52 kgSiggaard
48
67 kgGuderzo
49
54 kgde Vries
51
62 kgTenniglo
55
64 kgMarkus
56
61 kgGilmore
58
56 kgKasper
63
59 kgScandolara
67
52 kgKröger
76
77 kgMartin
80
57 kgFahlin
93
63 kgEdwards
105
59 kgHanselmann
108
55 kgSchneitter
109
59 kgHatteland Lima
118
65 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
77
52
1
118
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | WILD Kirsten | 75 |
| 2 | VAN DIJK Ellen | 71 |
| 3 | SLAPPENDEL Iris | 67 |
| 4 | GUNNEWIJK Loes | 67 |
| 5 | VISSER Adrie | 59 |
| 6 | VAN DER BREGGEN Anna | 56 |
| 7 | BRENNAUER Lisa | 63 |
| 8 | VAN VLEUTEN Annemiek | 59 |
| 9 | MAJERUS Christine | 56 |
| 10 | ROWE Danielle | 65 |
| 13 | KITCHEN Lauren | 60 |
| 14 | ARYS Evelyn | 60 |
| 15 | BRAND Lucinda | 57 |
| 16 | ANTOSHINA Tatiana | 55 |
| 17 | TROTT Laura | 56 |
| 19 | ELVIN Gracie | 63 |
| 20 | DEIGNAN Elizabeth | 57 |
| 21 | SMALL Carmen | 55 |
| 23 | POLSPOEL Maaike | 59 |
| 24 | D'HOORE Jolien | 63 |
| 25 | KOSTER Anouska | 56 |
| 26 | EDMONDSON Annette | 66 |
| 29 | GUARNIER Megan | 54 |
| 30 | PIETERS Amy | 58 |
| 31 | MOBERG Emilie | 56 |
| 32 | NEFF Jolanda | 53 |
| 35 | MARCHE Shara | 58 |
| 36 | BECKER Charlotte | 64 |
| 38 | HOSKING Chloe | 60 |
| 39 | KESSLER Nina | 60 |
| 41 | GU Sungeun | 55 |
| 44 | DRUYTS Kelly | 62 |
| 45 | LECHNER Eva | 52 |
| 48 | SIGGAARD Christina | 67 |
| 49 | GUDERZO Tatiana | 54 |
| 51 | DE VRIES Marijn | 62 |
| 55 | TENNIGLO Moniek | 64 |
| 56 | MARKUS Riejanne | 61 |
| 58 | GILMORE Rochelle | 56 |
| 63 | KASPER Romy | 59 |
| 67 | SCANDOLARA Valentina | 52 |
| 76 | KRÖGER Mieke | 77 |
| 80 | MARTIN Lucy | 57 |
| 93 | FAHLIN Emilia | 63 |
| 105 | EDWARDS Ruth | 59 |
| 108 | HANSELMANN Nicole | 55 |
| 109 | SCHNEITTER Nathalie | 59 |
| 118 | HATTELAND LIMA Tone | 65 |