Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -0.5 * weight + 74
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -0.5 positions in the result.
Pellaud
1
70 kgMertens
4
67 kgVerschaeve
5
62 kgReutimann
6
71 kgLienhard
9
73 kgDeltombe
13
66 kgVan Tricht
15
64 kgVansevenant
16
60 kgTeugels
18
64 kgBouts
20
62 kgMaris
21
64 kgNaudts
24
60 kgMayrhofer
26
70 kgLemoine
28
62 kgTasset
29
63 kgReynders
31
76 kgEyskens
32
68 kgReynaerts
33
67 kgSlock
34
78 kgBonneu
37
62 kgArensman
39
69.5 kgHavik
41
73 kgRichard
42
55 kgMaciejuk
43
78 kgHuys
44
61 kgVan Gestel
46
74 kgBennett
47
58 kgVan Rooy
50
70 kgEvans
51
63 kgVerwilst
52
68 kgGoossens
54
64 kgVan Gompel
57
70 kgMalle
59
60 kgDemeyere
62
78 kgMcDunphy
63
70 kgRüegg
67
66 kgAntunes
68
55 kgSchelling
69
66 kgGall
71
66 kgWillems
72
67 kgPlanckaert
73
69 kgMoniquet
74
61 kgSedlacek
76
65 kgSalmon
78
59 kgKaesemans
79
66 kgSchizzi
80
62 kgRüegg
81
66 kg
1
70 kgMertens
4
67 kgVerschaeve
5
62 kgReutimann
6
71 kgLienhard
9
73 kgDeltombe
13
66 kgVan Tricht
15
64 kgVansevenant
16
60 kgTeugels
18
64 kgBouts
20
62 kgMaris
21
64 kgNaudts
24
60 kgMayrhofer
26
70 kgLemoine
28
62 kgTasset
29
63 kgReynders
31
76 kgEyskens
32
68 kgReynaerts
33
67 kgSlock
34
78 kgBonneu
37
62 kgArensman
39
69.5 kgHavik
41
73 kgRichard
42
55 kgMaciejuk
43
78 kgHuys
44
61 kgVan Gestel
46
74 kgBennett
47
58 kgVan Rooy
50
70 kgEvans
51
63 kgVerwilst
52
68 kgGoossens
54
64 kgVan Gompel
57
70 kgMalle
59
60 kgDemeyere
62
78 kgMcDunphy
63
70 kgRüegg
67
66 kgAntunes
68
55 kgSchelling
69
66 kgGall
71
66 kgWillems
72
67 kgPlanckaert
73
69 kgMoniquet
74
61 kgSedlacek
76
65 kgSalmon
78
59 kgKaesemans
79
66 kgSchizzi
80
62 kgRüegg
81
66 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
78
55
1
81
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | PELLAUD Simon | 70 |
| 4 | MERTENS Julian | 67 |
| 5 | VERSCHAEVE Viktor | 62 |
| 6 | REUTIMANN Matthias | 71 |
| 9 | LIENHARD Fabian | 73 |
| 13 | DELTOMBE Kevin | 66 |
| 15 | VAN TRICHT Stan | 64 |
| 16 | VANSEVENANT Mauri | 60 |
| 18 | TEUGELS Lennert | 64 |
| 20 | BOUTS Jordy | 62 |
| 21 | MARIS Elias | 64 |
| 24 | NAUDTS Thomas | 60 |
| 26 | MAYRHOFER Marius | 70 |
| 28 | LEMOINE Gaëtan | 62 |
| 29 | TASSET Marvin | 63 |
| 31 | REYNDERS Jens | 76 |
| 32 | EYSKENS Jeroen | 68 |
| 33 | REYNAERTS Jan | 67 |
| 34 | SLOCK Liam | 78 |
| 37 | BONNEU Kamiel | 62 |
| 39 | ARENSMAN Thymen | 69.5 |
| 41 | HAVIK Piotr | 73 |
| 42 | RICHARD Maxime | 55 |
| 43 | MACIEJUK Filip | 78 |
| 44 | HUYS Laurens | 61 |
| 46 | VAN GESTEL Dries | 74 |
| 47 | BENNETT Stéfan | 58 |
| 50 | VAN ROOY Kenneth | 70 |
| 51 | EVANS Alexander | 63 |
| 52 | VERWILST Aaron | 68 |
| 54 | GOOSSENS Kobe | 64 |
| 57 | VAN GOMPEL Mathias | 70 |
| 59 | MALLE Nicolas | 60 |
| 62 | DEMEYERE Torsten | 78 |
| 63 | MCDUNPHY Conn | 70 |
| 67 | RÜEGG Lukas | 66 |
| 68 | ANTUNES Tiago | 55 |
| 69 | SCHELLING Ide | 66 |
| 71 | GALL Felix | 66 |
| 72 | WILLEMS Thimo | 67 |
| 73 | PLANCKAERT Emiel | 69 |
| 74 | MONIQUET Sylvain | 61 |
| 76 | SEDLACEK Vojtěch | 65 |
| 78 | SALMON Martin | 59 |
| 79 | KAESEMANS Jasper | 66 |
| 80 | SCHIZZI Vitor Zucco | 62 |
| 81 | RÜEGG Timon | 66 |