Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = 0.1 * weight + 37
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses 0.1 positions in the result.
van Vleuten
1
59 kgVos
2
58 kgArys
3
60 kgWilleit
5
54 kgGuarnier
7
54 kgNumainville
9
65 kgMajerus
10
56 kgFerrier-Bruneau
12
53 kgGrassi
13
56 kgBaccaille
17
61 kgGuarischi
19
57 kgVillumsen
20
59 kgKirchmann
23
59 kgFerrand-Prévot
24
53 kgMustonen
25
58 kgJohansson
27
58 kgVisser
28
59 kgRamsden
31
62 kgMartisova
32
64 kgFournier
33
60 kgBartelloni
35
63 kgHoffmann
36
62 kgHenrion
41
60 kgBatagelj
46
53 kgSanchis
47
56 kgDe Vocht
52
61 kgScandolara
56
52 kgvan der Breggen
57
56 kgNeylan
58
52 kgSpratt
61
55 kgMarche
64
58 kgAndruk
65
56 kgLongo Borghini
66
59 kgKitchen
67
60 kgPolspoel
71
59 kgPieters
78
58 kgArndt
80
59 kgPitel
81
52 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
83
64 kgCantele
85
58 kgMartin
89
57 kgDeignan
90
57 kgKupfernagel
91
68 kgKasper
92
59 kgBronzini
94
54 kg
1
59 kgVos
2
58 kgArys
3
60 kgWilleit
5
54 kgGuarnier
7
54 kgNumainville
9
65 kgMajerus
10
56 kgFerrier-Bruneau
12
53 kgGrassi
13
56 kgBaccaille
17
61 kgGuarischi
19
57 kgVillumsen
20
59 kgKirchmann
23
59 kgFerrand-Prévot
24
53 kgMustonen
25
58 kgJohansson
27
58 kgVisser
28
59 kgRamsden
31
62 kgMartisova
32
64 kgFournier
33
60 kgBartelloni
35
63 kgHoffmann
36
62 kgHenrion
41
60 kgBatagelj
46
53 kgSanchis
47
56 kgDe Vocht
52
61 kgScandolara
56
52 kgvan der Breggen
57
56 kgNeylan
58
52 kgSpratt
61
55 kgMarche
64
58 kgAndruk
65
56 kgLongo Borghini
66
59 kgKitchen
67
60 kgPolspoel
71
59 kgPieters
78
58 kgArndt
80
59 kgPitel
81
52 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
83
64 kgCantele
85
58 kgMartin
89
57 kgDeignan
90
57 kgKupfernagel
91
68 kgKasper
92
59 kgBronzini
94
54 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
68
52
1
94
# | Rider | Weight (KG) |
---|---|---|
1 | VAN VLEUTEN Annemiek | 59 |
2 | VOS Marianne | 58 |
3 | ARYS Evelyn | 60 |
5 | WILLEIT Cherise | 54 |
7 | GUARNIER Megan | 54 |
9 | NUMAINVILLE Joëlle | 65 |
10 | MAJERUS Christine | 56 |
12 | FERRIER-BRUNEAU Christel | 53 |
13 | GRASSI Giuseppina | 56 |
17 | BACCAILLE Monia | 61 |
19 | GUARISCHI Barbara | 57 |
20 | VILLUMSEN Linda | 59 |
23 | KIRCHMANN Leah | 59 |
24 | FERRAND-PRÉVOT Pauline | 53 |
25 | MUSTONEN Sara | 58 |
27 | JOHANSSON Emma | 58 |
28 | VISSER Adrie | 59 |
31 | RAMSDEN Denise | 62 |
32 | MARTISOVA Julia | 64 |
33 | FOURNIER Roxane | 60 |
35 | BARTELLONI Beatrice | 63 |
36 | HOFFMANN Chantal | 62 |
41 | HENRION Ludivine | 60 |
46 | BATAGELJ Polona | 53 |
47 | SANCHIS Anna | 56 |
52 | DE VOCHT Liesbet | 61 |
56 | SCANDOLARA Valentina | 52 |
57 | VAN DER BREGGEN Anna | 56 |
58 | NEYLAN Rachel | 52 |
61 | SPRATT Amanda | 55 |
64 | MARCHE Shara | 58 |
65 | ANDRUK Alona | 56 |
66 | LONGO BORGHINI Elisa | 59 |
67 | KITCHEN Lauren | 60 |
71 | POLSPOEL Maaike | 59 |
78 | PIETERS Amy | 58 |
80 | ARNDT Judith | 59 |
81 | PITEL Edwige | 52 |
83 | VAN DEN BROEK-BLAAK Chantal | 64 |
85 | CANTELE Noemi | 58 |
89 | MARTIN Lucy | 57 |
90 | DEIGNAN Elizabeth | 57 |
91 | KUPFERNAGEL Hanka | 68 |
92 | KASPER Romy | 59 |
94 | BRONZINI Giorgia | 54 |