Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = 0.8 * weight - 13
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses 0.8 positions in the result.
Dekker
1
66 kgBoogerd
2
62 kgDavis
4
73 kgLjungqvist
5
73 kgKessler
6
70 kgWegmann
7
60 kgBölts
8
73 kgSchumacher
10
71 kgAmorison
11
70 kgUllrich
12
73 kgGlasner
13
72 kgGrabsch
14
78 kgAerts
15
68 kgSørensen
16
70 kgZampieri
18
62 kgCheula
20
62 kgNiermann
21
64 kgSunderland
22
65 kgMoos
25
64 kgArvesen
29
74 kgRast
30
80 kgVan Huffel
32
66 kgSinkewitz
33
63 kgCox
36
62 kgBecke
40
75 kgJohansen
41
78 kgTotschnig
45
62 kgFothen
49
71 kgWrolich
50
68 kgGrabsch
52
81 kgLang
56
77 kgSchröder
58
64 kgWesemann
59
72 kgHiekmann
62
70 kgSchmidt
63
73 kgden Bakker
64
71 kgWauters
65
73 kgFörster
66
83 kgMüller
73
79 kgBeuchat
74
62 kgBergmann
75
68 kgBeeckman
81
66 kgVerbrugghe
86
69 kgAdamsson
87
68 kgde Jongh
89
76 kgde Groot
90
65 kgHayman
91
78 kgPollack
97
77 kgScholz
98
60 kgBaumann
104
72 kg
1
66 kgBoogerd
2
62 kgDavis
4
73 kgLjungqvist
5
73 kgKessler
6
70 kgWegmann
7
60 kgBölts
8
73 kgSchumacher
10
71 kgAmorison
11
70 kgUllrich
12
73 kgGlasner
13
72 kgGrabsch
14
78 kgAerts
15
68 kgSørensen
16
70 kgZampieri
18
62 kgCheula
20
62 kgNiermann
21
64 kgSunderland
22
65 kgMoos
25
64 kgArvesen
29
74 kgRast
30
80 kgVan Huffel
32
66 kgSinkewitz
33
63 kgCox
36
62 kgBecke
40
75 kgJohansen
41
78 kgTotschnig
45
62 kgFothen
49
71 kgWrolich
50
68 kgGrabsch
52
81 kgLang
56
77 kgSchröder
58
64 kgWesemann
59
72 kgHiekmann
62
70 kgSchmidt
63
73 kgden Bakker
64
71 kgWauters
65
73 kgFörster
66
83 kgMüller
73
79 kgBeuchat
74
62 kgBergmann
75
68 kgBeeckman
81
66 kgVerbrugghe
86
69 kgAdamsson
87
68 kgde Jongh
89
76 kgde Groot
90
65 kgHayman
91
78 kgPollack
97
77 kgScholz
98
60 kgBaumann
104
72 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
83
60
1
104
# | Rider | Weight (KG) |
---|---|---|
1 | DEKKER Erik | 66 |
2 | BOOGERD Michael | 62 |
4 | DAVIS Allan | 73 |
5 | LJUNGQVIST Marcus | 73 |
6 | KESSLER Matthias | 70 |
7 | WEGMANN Fabian | 60 |
8 | BÖLTS Udo | 73 |
10 | SCHUMACHER Stefan | 71 |
11 | AMORISON Frédéric | 70 |
12 | ULLRICH Jan | 73 |
13 | GLASNER Björn | 72 |
14 | GRABSCH Bert | 78 |
15 | AERTS Mario | 68 |
16 | SØRENSEN Rolf | 70 |
18 | ZAMPIERI Steve | 62 |
20 | CHEULA Giampaolo | 62 |
21 | NIERMANN Grischa | 64 |
22 | SUNDERLAND Scott | 65 |
25 | MOOS Alexandre | 64 |
29 | ARVESEN Kurt-Asle | 74 |
30 | RAST Grégory | 80 |
32 | VAN HUFFEL Wim | 66 |
33 | SINKEWITZ Patrik | 63 |
36 | COX Ryan | 62 |
40 | BECKE Daniel | 75 |
41 | JOHANSEN Allan | 78 |
45 | TOTSCHNIG Georg | 62 |
49 | FOTHEN Markus | 71 |
50 | WROLICH Peter | 68 |
52 | GRABSCH Ralf | 81 |
56 | LANG Sebastian | 77 |
58 | SCHRÖDER Björn | 64 |
59 | WESEMANN Steffen | 72 |
62 | HIEKMANN Torsten | 70 |
63 | SCHMIDT Torsten | 73 |
64 | DEN BAKKER Maarten | 71 |
65 | WAUTERS Marc | 73 |
66 | FÖRSTER Robert | 83 |
73 | MÜLLER Martin | 79 |
74 | BEUCHAT Roger | 62 |
75 | BERGMANN Reto | 68 |
81 | BEECKMAN Koen | 66 |
86 | VERBRUGGHE Ief | 69 |
87 | ADAMSSON Stefan | 68 |
89 | DE JONGH Steven | 76 |
90 | DE GROOT Bram | 65 |
91 | HAYMAN Mathew | 78 |
97 | POLLACK Olaf | 77 |
98 | SCHOLZ Ronny | 60 |
104 | BAUMANN Eric | 72 |