Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -0.9 * weight + 88
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -0.9 positions in the result.
Wiebes
1
60 kgKopecky
2
66 kgFahlin
3
63 kgD'hoore
4
63 kgMagner
5
57 kgBrand
6
57 kgVerhulst-Wild
7
58 kgNorsgaard
8
65 kgHenderson
10
58 kgKlein
12
61 kgWild
13
75 kgDemey
14
56 kgJounier
15
58 kgLippert
16
56 kgMajerus
18
56 kgSüßemilch
19
67 kgCurinier
20
53 kgPieters
21
58 kgBrennauer
23
63 kgHammes
24
54 kgDeignan
27
57 kgErath
34
62 kgLudwig
38
55 kgEnsing
40
62 kgCavalli
42
53 kgKasper
44
59 kgNorman Leth
46
68 kgHarris
47
57 kgAndersen
48
55 kgCordon-Ragot
50
60 kgCopponi
51
55 kgMackaij
52
57 kgTeutenberg
57
53 kgDuyck
58
60 kgCecchini
61
52 kgvan Dijk
63
71 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
64
64 kgBecker
65
64 kgLaurance
66
62 kgGuarischi
68
57 kgTeruel
69
56 kgGutiérrez
70
60 kgBiannic
71
64 kgOyarbide
72
52 kgYonamine
76
51 kgRiffel
79
57 kg
1
60 kgKopecky
2
66 kgFahlin
3
63 kgD'hoore
4
63 kgMagner
5
57 kgBrand
6
57 kgVerhulst-Wild
7
58 kgNorsgaard
8
65 kgHenderson
10
58 kgKlein
12
61 kgWild
13
75 kgDemey
14
56 kgJounier
15
58 kgLippert
16
56 kgMajerus
18
56 kgSüßemilch
19
67 kgCurinier
20
53 kgPieters
21
58 kgBrennauer
23
63 kgHammes
24
54 kgDeignan
27
57 kgErath
34
62 kgLudwig
38
55 kgEnsing
40
62 kgCavalli
42
53 kgKasper
44
59 kgNorman Leth
46
68 kgHarris
47
57 kgAndersen
48
55 kgCordon-Ragot
50
60 kgCopponi
51
55 kgMackaij
52
57 kgTeutenberg
57
53 kgDuyck
58
60 kgCecchini
61
52 kgvan Dijk
63
71 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
64
64 kgBecker
65
64 kgLaurance
66
62 kgGuarischi
68
57 kgTeruel
69
56 kgGutiérrez
70
60 kgBiannic
71
64 kgOyarbide
72
52 kgYonamine
76
51 kgRiffel
79
57 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
75
51
1
79
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | WIEBES Lorena | 60 |
| 2 | KOPECKY Lotte | 66 |
| 3 | FAHLIN Emilia | 63 |
| 4 | D'HOORE Jolien | 63 |
| 5 | MAGNER Alexis | 57 |
| 6 | BRAND Lucinda | 57 |
| 7 | VERHULST-WILD Gladys | 58 |
| 8 | NORSGAARD Emma | 65 |
| 10 | HENDERSON Anna | 58 |
| 12 | KLEIN Lisa | 61 |
| 13 | WILD Kirsten | 75 |
| 14 | DEMEY Valerie | 56 |
| 15 | JOUNIER Lucie | 58 |
| 16 | LIPPERT Liane | 56 |
| 18 | MAJERUS Christine | 56 |
| 19 | SÜßEMILCH Laura | 67 |
| 20 | CURINIER Léa | 53 |
| 21 | PIETERS Amy | 58 |
| 23 | BRENNAUER Lisa | 63 |
| 24 | HAMMES Kathrin | 54 |
| 27 | DEIGNAN Elizabeth | 57 |
| 34 | ERATH Tanja | 62 |
| 38 | LUDWIG Hannah | 55 |
| 40 | ENSING Janneke | 62 |
| 42 | CAVALLI Marta | 53 |
| 44 | KASPER Romy | 59 |
| 46 | NORMAN LETH Julie | 68 |
| 47 | HARRIS Ella | 57 |
| 48 | ANDERSEN Susanne | 55 |
| 50 | CORDON-RAGOT Audrey | 60 |
| 51 | COPPONI Clara | 55 |
| 52 | MACKAIJ Floortje | 57 |
| 57 | TEUTENBERG Lea Lin | 53 |
| 58 | DUYCK Ann-Sophie | 60 |
| 61 | CECCHINI Elena | 52 |
| 63 | VAN DIJK Ellen | 71 |
| 64 | VAN DEN BROEK-BLAAK Chantal | 64 |
| 65 | BECKER Charlotte | 64 |
| 66 | LAURANCE Typhaine | 62 |
| 68 | GUARISCHI Barbara | 57 |
| 69 | TERUEL Alba | 56 |
| 70 | GUTIÉRREZ Sheyla | 60 |
| 71 | BIANNIC Aude | 64 |
| 72 | OYARBIDE Lourdes | 52 |
| 76 | YONAMINE Eri | 51 |
| 79 | RIFFEL Christa | 57 |