Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = 1.2 * weight - 25
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses 1.2 positions in the result.
Vos
1
58 kgJohansson
2
58 kgArndt
3
59 kgvan Vleuten
5
59 kgFerrier-Bruneau
6
53 kgFahlin
9
63 kgSöderberg
10
60 kgJasinska
11
57 kgBatagelj
14
53 kgLongo Borghini
15
59 kgLaws
17
54 kgMarche
23
58 kgZabelinskaya
24
52 kgPolspoel
25
59 kgVillumsen
27
59 kgLichtenberg
28
52 kgCantele
30
58 kgMartisova
31
64 kgPieters
33
58 kgKashchyshyna
34
53 kgBrennauer
38
63 kgKasper
45
59 kgStander
47
57 kgSpratt
51
55 kgScandolara
53
52 kgMustonen
55
58 kgBrand
58
57 kgde Vries
59
62 kgDeignan
60
57 kgHenrion
61
60 kgGunnewijk
62
67 kgTeutenberg
63
64 kgSanchis
64
56 kgBecker
66
64 kgSandig
71
62 kgvan Dijk
74
71 kgMoberg
76
56 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
79
64 kgOlaberria
82
61 kgValsecchi
86
58 kgFrapporti
87
63 kgHannes
88
51 kgAndruk
91
56 kgLópez
97
54 kg
1
58 kgJohansson
2
58 kgArndt
3
59 kgvan Vleuten
5
59 kgFerrier-Bruneau
6
53 kgFahlin
9
63 kgSöderberg
10
60 kgJasinska
11
57 kgBatagelj
14
53 kgLongo Borghini
15
59 kgLaws
17
54 kgMarche
23
58 kgZabelinskaya
24
52 kgPolspoel
25
59 kgVillumsen
27
59 kgLichtenberg
28
52 kgCantele
30
58 kgMartisova
31
64 kgPieters
33
58 kgKashchyshyna
34
53 kgBrennauer
38
63 kgKasper
45
59 kgStander
47
57 kgSpratt
51
55 kgScandolara
53
52 kgMustonen
55
58 kgBrand
58
57 kgde Vries
59
62 kgDeignan
60
57 kgHenrion
61
60 kgGunnewijk
62
67 kgTeutenberg
63
64 kgSanchis
64
56 kgBecker
66
64 kgSandig
71
62 kgvan Dijk
74
71 kgMoberg
76
56 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
79
64 kgOlaberria
82
61 kgValsecchi
86
58 kgFrapporti
87
63 kgHannes
88
51 kgAndruk
91
56 kgLópez
97
54 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
71
51
1
97
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | VOS Marianne | 58 |
| 2 | JOHANSSON Emma | 58 |
| 3 | ARNDT Judith | 59 |
| 5 | VAN VLEUTEN Annemiek | 59 |
| 6 | FERRIER-BRUNEAU Christel | 53 |
| 9 | FAHLIN Emilia | 63 |
| 10 | SÖDERBERG Isabelle | 60 |
| 11 | JASINSKA Małgorzata | 57 |
| 14 | BATAGELJ Polona | 53 |
| 15 | LONGO BORGHINI Elisa | 59 |
| 17 | LAWS Sharon | 54 |
| 23 | MARCHE Shara | 58 |
| 24 | ZABELINSKAYA Olga | 52 |
| 25 | POLSPOEL Maaike | 59 |
| 27 | VILLUMSEN Linda | 59 |
| 28 | LICHTENBERG Claudia | 52 |
| 30 | CANTELE Noemi | 58 |
| 31 | MARTISOVA Julia | 64 |
| 33 | PIETERS Amy | 58 |
| 34 | KASHCHYSHYNA Oksana | 53 |
| 38 | BRENNAUER Lisa | 63 |
| 45 | KASPER Romy | 59 |
| 47 | STANDER Marissa | 57 |
| 51 | SPRATT Amanda | 55 |
| 53 | SCANDOLARA Valentina | 52 |
| 55 | MUSTONEN Sara | 58 |
| 58 | BRAND Lucinda | 57 |
| 59 | DE VRIES Marijn | 62 |
| 60 | DEIGNAN Elizabeth | 57 |
| 61 | HENRION Ludivine | 60 |
| 62 | GUNNEWIJK Loes | 67 |
| 63 | TEUTENBERG Ina-Yoko | 64 |
| 64 | SANCHIS Anna | 56 |
| 66 | BECKER Charlotte | 64 |
| 71 | SANDIG Madeleine | 62 |
| 74 | VAN DIJK Ellen | 71 |
| 76 | MOBERG Emilie | 56 |
| 79 | VAN DEN BROEK-BLAAK Chantal | 64 |
| 82 | OLABERRIA Leire | 61 |
| 86 | VALSECCHI Silvia | 58 |
| 87 | FRAPPORTI Simona | 63 |
| 88 | HANNES Kaat | 51 |
| 91 | ANDRUK Alona | 56 |
| 97 | LÓPEZ Belén | 54 |