Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -1.4 * weight + 122
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -1.4 positions in the result.
Wild
1
75 kgHosking
2
60 kgvan Dijk
3
71 kgArndt
4
59 kgGunnewijk
6
67 kgBaccaille
8
61 kgBecker
9
64 kgCecchini
13
52 kgDe Vocht
14
61 kgSlappendel
16
67 kgGuderzo
17
54 kgSpratt
19
55 kgVisser
21
59 kgBiannic
22
64 kgOlds
23
54 kgPieters
27
58 kgMustonen
29
58 kgSandig
32
62 kgPolspoel
33
59 kgLiu
34
52 kgRyan
35
59 kgHannes
39
51 kgKasper
42
59 kgDuyck
44
60 kgCordon-Ragot
46
60 kgHatteland Lima
47
65 kgJeuland-Tranchant
48
61 kgScandolara
50
52 kgBatagelj
51
53 kgBastianelli
53
60 kgvan der Breggen
57
56 kgLongo Borghini
61
59 kgBronzini
63
54 kgCantele
64
58 kgVekemans
67
52 kgWilleit
68
54 kgKitchen
69
60 kgAndruk
75
56 kgBrennauer
76
63 kgLuo
78
68 kgHenrion
85
60 kgConfalonieri
87
56 kg
1
75 kgHosking
2
60 kgvan Dijk
3
71 kgArndt
4
59 kgGunnewijk
6
67 kgBaccaille
8
61 kgBecker
9
64 kgCecchini
13
52 kgDe Vocht
14
61 kgSlappendel
16
67 kgGuderzo
17
54 kgSpratt
19
55 kgVisser
21
59 kgBiannic
22
64 kgOlds
23
54 kgPieters
27
58 kgMustonen
29
58 kgSandig
32
62 kgPolspoel
33
59 kgLiu
34
52 kgRyan
35
59 kgHannes
39
51 kgKasper
42
59 kgDuyck
44
60 kgCordon-Ragot
46
60 kgHatteland Lima
47
65 kgJeuland-Tranchant
48
61 kgScandolara
50
52 kgBatagelj
51
53 kgBastianelli
53
60 kgvan der Breggen
57
56 kgLongo Borghini
61
59 kgBronzini
63
54 kgCantele
64
58 kgVekemans
67
52 kgWilleit
68
54 kgKitchen
69
60 kgAndruk
75
56 kgBrennauer
76
63 kgLuo
78
68 kgHenrion
85
60 kgConfalonieri
87
56 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
75
51
1
87
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | WILD Kirsten | 75 |
| 2 | HOSKING Chloe | 60 |
| 3 | VAN DIJK Ellen | 71 |
| 4 | ARNDT Judith | 59 |
| 6 | GUNNEWIJK Loes | 67 |
| 8 | BACCAILLE Monia | 61 |
| 9 | BECKER Charlotte | 64 |
| 13 | CECCHINI Elena | 52 |
| 14 | DE VOCHT Liesbet | 61 |
| 16 | SLAPPENDEL Iris | 67 |
| 17 | GUDERZO Tatiana | 54 |
| 19 | SPRATT Amanda | 55 |
| 21 | VISSER Adrie | 59 |
| 22 | BIANNIC Aude | 64 |
| 23 | OLDS Shelley | 54 |
| 27 | PIETERS Amy | 58 |
| 29 | MUSTONEN Sara | 58 |
| 32 | SANDIG Madeleine | 62 |
| 33 | POLSPOEL Maaike | 59 |
| 34 | LIU Xin | 52 |
| 35 | RYAN Kendall | 59 |
| 39 | HANNES Kaat | 51 |
| 42 | KASPER Romy | 59 |
| 44 | DUYCK Ann-Sophie | 60 |
| 46 | CORDON-RAGOT Audrey | 60 |
| 47 | HATTELAND LIMA Tone | 65 |
| 48 | JEULAND-TRANCHANT Pascale | 61 |
| 50 | SCANDOLARA Valentina | 52 |
| 51 | BATAGELJ Polona | 53 |
| 53 | BASTIANELLI Marta | 60 |
| 57 | VAN DER BREGGEN Anna | 56 |
| 61 | LONGO BORGHINI Elisa | 59 |
| 63 | BRONZINI Giorgia | 54 |
| 64 | CANTELE Noemi | 58 |
| 67 | VEKEMANS Anisha | 52 |
| 68 | WILLEIT Cherise | 54 |
| 69 | KITCHEN Lauren | 60 |
| 75 | ANDRUK Alona | 56 |
| 76 | BRENNAUER Lisa | 63 |
| 78 | LUO Xiao Ling | 68 |
| 85 | HENRION Ludivine | 60 |
| 87 | CONFALONIERI Maria Giulia | 56 |