Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -0.4 * weight + 59
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -0.4 positions in the result.
Wild
1
75 kgHosking
2
60 kgElvin
3
63 kgvan Dijk
4
71 kgJohansson
6
58 kgBrennauer
8
63 kgKitchen
10
60 kgSpratt
11
55 kgBronzini
12
54 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
13
64 kgSmall
14
55 kgLongo Borghini
15
59 kgLichtenberg
16
52 kgBecker
18
64 kgFrapporti
19
63 kgKiesanowski
20
56 kgOlds
21
54 kgJasinska
24
57 kgAmialiusik
27
53 kgFahlin
30
63 kgSlappendel
31
67 kgGunnewijk
32
67 kgPieters
33
58 kgScandolara
35
52 kgCordon-Ragot
36
60 kgGuarischi
37
57 kgCantele
39
58 kgGuderzo
40
54 kgMeng
42
65 kgDuehring
44
54 kgCecchini
47
52 kgBrand
48
57 kgvan der Breggen
49
56 kgConfalonieri
50
56 kgJeuland-Tranchant
51
61 kgBartelloni
52
63 kgde Baat
53
56 kgValsecchi
65
58 kgWong Wan
66
54 kgKröger
69
77 kgFournier
72
60 kgHatteland Lima
79
65 kgVekemans
82
52 kg
1
75 kgHosking
2
60 kgElvin
3
63 kgvan Dijk
4
71 kgJohansson
6
58 kgBrennauer
8
63 kgKitchen
10
60 kgSpratt
11
55 kgBronzini
12
54 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
13
64 kgSmall
14
55 kgLongo Borghini
15
59 kgLichtenberg
16
52 kgBecker
18
64 kgFrapporti
19
63 kgKiesanowski
20
56 kgOlds
21
54 kgJasinska
24
57 kgAmialiusik
27
53 kgFahlin
30
63 kgSlappendel
31
67 kgGunnewijk
32
67 kgPieters
33
58 kgScandolara
35
52 kgCordon-Ragot
36
60 kgGuarischi
37
57 kgCantele
39
58 kgGuderzo
40
54 kgMeng
42
65 kgDuehring
44
54 kgCecchini
47
52 kgBrand
48
57 kgvan der Breggen
49
56 kgConfalonieri
50
56 kgJeuland-Tranchant
51
61 kgBartelloni
52
63 kgde Baat
53
56 kgValsecchi
65
58 kgWong Wan
66
54 kgKröger
69
77 kgFournier
72
60 kgHatteland Lima
79
65 kgVekemans
82
52 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
77
52
1
82
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | WILD Kirsten | 75 |
| 2 | HOSKING Chloe | 60 |
| 3 | ELVIN Gracie | 63 |
| 4 | VAN DIJK Ellen | 71 |
| 6 | JOHANSSON Emma | 58 |
| 8 | BRENNAUER Lisa | 63 |
| 10 | KITCHEN Lauren | 60 |
| 11 | SPRATT Amanda | 55 |
| 12 | BRONZINI Giorgia | 54 |
| 13 | VAN DEN BROEK-BLAAK Chantal | 64 |
| 14 | SMALL Carmen | 55 |
| 15 | LONGO BORGHINI Elisa | 59 |
| 16 | LICHTENBERG Claudia | 52 |
| 18 | BECKER Charlotte | 64 |
| 19 | FRAPPORTI Simona | 63 |
| 20 | KIESANOWSKI Joanne | 56 |
| 21 | OLDS Shelley | 54 |
| 24 | JASINSKA Małgorzata | 57 |
| 27 | AMIALIUSIK Alena | 53 |
| 30 | FAHLIN Emilia | 63 |
| 31 | SLAPPENDEL Iris | 67 |
| 32 | GUNNEWIJK Loes | 67 |
| 33 | PIETERS Amy | 58 |
| 35 | SCANDOLARA Valentina | 52 |
| 36 | CORDON-RAGOT Audrey | 60 |
| 37 | GUARISCHI Barbara | 57 |
| 39 | CANTELE Noemi | 58 |
| 40 | GUDERZO Tatiana | 54 |
| 42 | MENG Lang | 65 |
| 44 | DUEHRING Jasmin | 54 |
| 47 | CECCHINI Elena | 52 |
| 48 | BRAND Lucinda | 57 |
| 49 | VAN DER BREGGEN Anna | 56 |
| 50 | CONFALONIERI Maria Giulia | 56 |
| 51 | JEULAND-TRANCHANT Pascale | 61 |
| 52 | BARTELLONI Beatrice | 63 |
| 53 | DE BAAT Kim | 56 |
| 65 | VALSECCHI Silvia | 58 |
| 66 | WONG WAN Yiu | 54 |
| 69 | KRÖGER Mieke | 77 |
| 72 | FOURNIER Roxane | 60 |
| 79 | HATTELAND LIMA Tone | 65 |
| 82 | VEKEMANS Anisha | 52 |