Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -1.5 * weight + 168
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -1.5 positions in the result.
Boivin
1
78 kgHalleguen
3
67 kgFouchard
4
74 kgAnderson
5
68 kgBrammeier
6
72 kgDelpech
8
72 kgFonseca
9
56 kgSteels
12
78 kgLabbé
14
73 kgJégou
17
71 kgAlbert
21
73 kgLaengen
24
79 kgBoily
26
60 kgLacombe
27
81 kgMorice
34
81 kgCraven
43
75 kgFukushima
48
62 kgJang
53
64 kgChoe
55
63 kgPedraza
58
58 kgGuillemois
59
66 kgIsta
60
70 kgTamouridis
61
70 kgČanecký
62
72 kgLebas
64
65 kgDaniel
65
74 kgSchmitz
68
77 kgBonsergent
69
66 kgDempster
75
77 kgTeklehaimanot
80
70 kgChoi
83
59 kgBlot
85
71 kgDe Poortere
93
70 kgMcEvoy
94
67 kgMcNally
96
72 kgMcconvey
99
67 kgTennant
100
82 kgBarguil
109
61 kgKeukeleire
113
69 kgLe Bon
115
70 kgLapthorne
121
70 kgBerden
129
69 kgVanthourenhout
131
64 kgWalsleben
132
66 kgParisien
137
64 kgValentin
138
69 kg
1
78 kgHalleguen
3
67 kgFouchard
4
74 kgAnderson
5
68 kgBrammeier
6
72 kgDelpech
8
72 kgFonseca
9
56 kgSteels
12
78 kgLabbé
14
73 kgJégou
17
71 kgAlbert
21
73 kgLaengen
24
79 kgBoily
26
60 kgLacombe
27
81 kgMorice
34
81 kgCraven
43
75 kgFukushima
48
62 kgJang
53
64 kgChoe
55
63 kgPedraza
58
58 kgGuillemois
59
66 kgIsta
60
70 kgTamouridis
61
70 kgČanecký
62
72 kgLebas
64
65 kgDaniel
65
74 kgSchmitz
68
77 kgBonsergent
69
66 kgDempster
75
77 kgTeklehaimanot
80
70 kgChoi
83
59 kgBlot
85
71 kgDe Poortere
93
70 kgMcEvoy
94
67 kgMcNally
96
72 kgMcconvey
99
67 kgTennant
100
82 kgBarguil
109
61 kgKeukeleire
113
69 kgLe Bon
115
70 kgLapthorne
121
70 kgBerden
129
69 kgVanthourenhout
131
64 kgWalsleben
132
66 kgParisien
137
64 kgValentin
138
69 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
82
56
1
138
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | BOIVIN Guillaume | 78 |
| 3 | HALLEGUEN Mathieu | 67 |
| 4 | FOUCHARD Julien | 74 |
| 5 | ANDERSON Jack | 68 |
| 6 | BRAMMEIER Matt | 72 |
| 8 | DELPECH Jean-Luc | 72 |
| 9 | FONSECA Armindo | 56 |
| 12 | STEELS Stijn | 78 |
| 14 | LABBÉ Arnaud | 73 |
| 17 | JÉGOU Lilian | 71 |
| 21 | ALBERT Niels | 73 |
| 24 | LAENGEN Vegard Stake | 79 |
| 26 | BOILY David | 60 |
| 27 | LACOMBE Keven | 81 |
| 34 | MORICE Julien | 81 |
| 43 | CRAVEN Dan | 75 |
| 48 | FUKUSHIMA Shinichi | 62 |
| 53 | JANG Chan Jae | 64 |
| 55 | CHOE Hyeong Min | 63 |
| 58 | PEDRAZA Wálter Fernando | 58 |
| 59 | GUILLEMOIS Romain | 66 |
| 60 | ISTA Kevyn | 70 |
| 61 | TAMOURIDIS Ioannis | 70 |
| 62 | ČANECKÝ Marek | 72 |
| 64 | LEBAS Thomas | 65 |
| 65 | DANIEL Maxime | 74 |
| 68 | SCHMITZ Bram | 77 |
| 69 | BONSERGENT Stéphane | 66 |
| 75 | DEMPSTER Zak | 77 |
| 80 | TEKLEHAIMANOT Daniel | 70 |
| 83 | CHOI Ki Ho | 59 |
| 85 | BLOT Guillaume | 71 |
| 93 | DE POORTERE Ingmar | 70 |
| 94 | MCEVOY Jonathan | 67 |
| 96 | MCNALLY Mark | 72 |
| 99 | MCCONVEY Connor | 67 |
| 100 | TENNANT Andrew | 82 |
| 109 | BARGUIL Warren | 61 |
| 113 | KEUKELEIRE Jens | 69 |
| 115 | LE BON Johan | 70 |
| 121 | LAPTHORNE Darren | 70 |
| 129 | BERDEN Ben | 69 |
| 131 | VANTHOURENHOUT Dieter | 64 |
| 132 | WALSLEBEN Philipp | 66 |
| 137 | PARISIEN François | 64 |
| 138 | VALENTIN Tristan | 69 |