Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -0.5 * weight + 69
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -0.5 positions in the result.
Banaszek
1
75 kgMaciejuk
2
78 kgBudziński
3
70 kgFrątczak
4
70 kgBanaszek
5
75 kgBrożyna
6
71 kgWiśniowski
7
78 kgAniołkowski
8
68 kgBenedetti
9
63 kgKwiatkowski
10
68 kgGradek
11
83 kgSzóstka
12
63 kgSajnok
13
75 kgStosz
15
70 kgProkopyszyn
16
68 kgPomorski
20
76 kgKaczmarek
21
66 kgPodlaski
22
68 kgGieryk
23
71 kgMałecki
24
69 kgPszczolarski
25
73 kgŻuber
26
68 kgRajtak
28
68 kgPaterski
29
73 kgTracz
30
74 kgŻurek
33
63 kgGieracki
34
71 kgGajdulewicz
35
67 kgOwsian
39
66 kgRudyk
40
76 kgRadosz
41
69 kgMurias
42
65 kgBogusławski
43
77 kgSztuka
44
69 kgStachowiak
46
62 kgFijak
47
60 kgPawlak
48
81 kgSławek
49
73 kgBanaszek
50
79 kgMiazga
53
65 kgKostański
55
74 kgGrabis
59
75 kgKuś
64
70 kgPękala
65
65 kgSowiński
66
63 kgParma
67
72 kgKusy
68
58 kgPapierski
69
81 kg
1
75 kgMaciejuk
2
78 kgBudziński
3
70 kgFrątczak
4
70 kgBanaszek
5
75 kgBrożyna
6
71 kgWiśniowski
7
78 kgAniołkowski
8
68 kgBenedetti
9
63 kgKwiatkowski
10
68 kgGradek
11
83 kgSzóstka
12
63 kgSajnok
13
75 kgStosz
15
70 kgProkopyszyn
16
68 kgPomorski
20
76 kgKaczmarek
21
66 kgPodlaski
22
68 kgGieryk
23
71 kgMałecki
24
69 kgPszczolarski
25
73 kgŻuber
26
68 kgRajtak
28
68 kgPaterski
29
73 kgTracz
30
74 kgŻurek
33
63 kgGieracki
34
71 kgGajdulewicz
35
67 kgOwsian
39
66 kgRudyk
40
76 kgRadosz
41
69 kgMurias
42
65 kgBogusławski
43
77 kgSztuka
44
69 kgStachowiak
46
62 kgFijak
47
60 kgPawlak
48
81 kgSławek
49
73 kgBanaszek
50
79 kgMiazga
53
65 kgKostański
55
74 kgGrabis
59
75 kgKuś
64
70 kgPękala
65
65 kgSowiński
66
63 kgParma
67
72 kgKusy
68
58 kgPapierski
69
81 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
83
58
1
69
# | Rider | Weight (KG) |
---|---|---|
1 | BANASZEK Alan | 75 |
2 | MACIEJUK Filip | 78 |
3 | BUDZIŃSKI Marcin | 70 |
4 | FRĄTCZAK Radosław | 70 |
5 | BANASZEK Norbert | 75 |
6 | BROŻYNA Piotr | 71 |
7 | WIŚNIOWSKI Łukasz | 78 |
8 | ANIOŁKOWSKI Stanisław | 68 |
9 | BENEDETTI Cesare | 63 |
10 | KWIATKOWSKI Michał | 68 |
11 | GRADEK Kamil | 83 |
12 | SZÓSTKA Paweł | 63 |
13 | SAJNOK Szymon | 75 |
15 | STOSZ Patryk | 70 |
16 | PROKOPYSZYN Filip | 68 |
20 | POMORSKI Michał | 76 |
21 | KACZMAREK Jakub | 66 |
22 | PODLASKI Michał | 68 |
23 | GIERYK Kacper | 71 |
24 | MAŁECKI Kamil | 69 |
25 | PSZCZOLARSKI Wojciech | 73 |
26 | ŻUBER Adam | 68 |
28 | RAJTAK Mateusz | 68 |
29 | PATERSKI Maciej | 73 |
30 | TRACZ Szymon | 74 |
33 | ŻUREK Jakub | 63 |
34 | GIERACKI Patryk | 71 |
35 | GAJDULEWICZ Mateusz | 67 |
39 | OWSIAN Łukasz | 66 |
40 | RUDYK Bartosz | 76 |
41 | RADOSZ Maksymilian | 69 |
42 | MURIAS Jakub | 65 |
43 | BOGUSŁAWSKI Marceli | 77 |
44 | SZTUKA Marcin | 69 |
46 | STACHOWIAK Adam | 62 |
47 | FIJAK Jan | 60 |
48 | PAWLAK Tobiasz | 81 |
49 | SŁAWEK Damian | 73 |
50 | BANASZEK Adrian | 79 |
53 | MIAZGA Jan | 65 |
55 | KOSTAŃSKI Mateusz | 74 |
59 | GRABIS Mateusz | 75 |
64 | KUŚ Adam | 70 |
65 | PĘKALA Piotr | 65 |
66 | SOWIŃSKI Artur | 63 |
67 | PARMA Krzysztof | 72 |
68 | KUSY Karol | 58 |
69 | PAPIERSKI Damian | 81 |