Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = 1.8 * weight - 77
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses 1.8 positions in the result.
Ariesen
2
70 kgVon Hoff
3
70 kgvan Poppel
4
82 kgAsselman
6
69 kgRadochla
8
70 kgDe Bie
9
65 kgMeijers
11
70 kgBakker
14
74.5 kgHofland
15
71 kgPfingsten
18
69 kgDe Pauw
23
72 kgOelerich
26
70 kgGroenewegen
27
70 kgMertens
30
73 kgKuznetsov
31
70 kgSummerhill
32
70 kgde Jonge
35
65 kgde Vries
37
70 kgvan der Lijke
40
61 kgChaigneau
43
80 kgScully
44
85 kgHuizenga
46
72 kgFreiberg
50
82 kgCastelijns
53
70 kgvan Baarle
57
78 kgDe Buyst
58
72 kgDennis
59
72 kgde Greef
60
65 kgOostlander
64
78 kgO'Shea
65
76 kgHavik
68
66 kgFrison
69
84 kgKoning
73
77 kgvan Zijl
75
70 kgHowson
76
68 kgZepuntke
86
76 kgFlaksis
88
79 kgHelven
89
74 kgCort
90
68 kgLindeman
98
76 kgRybakov
106
65 kgAtzori
108
72 kgKreder
109
71 kgSchep
113
80 kgBeukeboom
116
88 kgForke
122
78 kgBoev
125
74 kg
2
70 kgVon Hoff
3
70 kgvan Poppel
4
82 kgAsselman
6
69 kgRadochla
8
70 kgDe Bie
9
65 kgMeijers
11
70 kgBakker
14
74.5 kgHofland
15
71 kgPfingsten
18
69 kgDe Pauw
23
72 kgOelerich
26
70 kgGroenewegen
27
70 kgMertens
30
73 kgKuznetsov
31
70 kgSummerhill
32
70 kgde Jonge
35
65 kgde Vries
37
70 kgvan der Lijke
40
61 kgChaigneau
43
80 kgScully
44
85 kgHuizenga
46
72 kgFreiberg
50
82 kgCastelijns
53
70 kgvan Baarle
57
78 kgDe Buyst
58
72 kgDennis
59
72 kgde Greef
60
65 kgOostlander
64
78 kgO'Shea
65
76 kgHavik
68
66 kgFrison
69
84 kgKoning
73
77 kgvan Zijl
75
70 kgHowson
76
68 kgZepuntke
86
76 kgFlaksis
88
79 kgHelven
89
74 kgCort
90
68 kgLindeman
98
76 kgRybakov
106
65 kgAtzori
108
72 kgKreder
109
71 kgSchep
113
80 kgBeukeboom
116
88 kgForke
122
78 kgBoev
125
74 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
88
61
2
125
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | ARIESEN Johim | 70 |
| 3 | VON HOFF Steele | 70 |
| 4 | VAN POPPEL Danny | 82 |
| 6 | ASSELMAN Jesper | 69 |
| 8 | RADOCHLA Steffen | 70 |
| 9 | DE BIE Sean | 65 |
| 11 | MEIJERS Daan | 70 |
| 14 | BAKKER Dennis | 74.5 |
| 15 | HOFLAND Moreno | 71 |
| 18 | PFINGSTEN Christoph | 69 |
| 23 | DE PAUW Moreno | 72 |
| 26 | OELERICH Jan | 70 |
| 27 | GROENEWEGEN Dylan | 70 |
| 30 | MERTENS Tim | 73 |
| 31 | KUZNETSOV Viacheslav | 70 |
| 32 | SUMMERHILL Daniel | 70 |
| 35 | DE JONGE Maarten | 65 |
| 37 | DE VRIES Berden | 70 |
| 40 | VAN DER LIJKE Nick | 61 |
| 43 | CHAIGNEAU Robin | 80 |
| 44 | SCULLY Tom | 85 |
| 46 | HUIZENGA Jenning | 72 |
| 50 | FREIBERG Michael | 82 |
| 53 | CASTELIJNS Twan | 70 |
| 57 | VAN BAARLE Dylan | 78 |
| 58 | DE BUYST Jasper | 72 |
| 59 | DENNIS Rohan | 72 |
| 60 | DE GREEF Robbert | 65 |
| 64 | OOSTLANDER Sander | 78 |
| 65 | O'SHEA Glenn | 76 |
| 68 | HAVIK Yoeri | 66 |
| 69 | FRISON Frederik | 84 |
| 73 | KONING Peter | 77 |
| 75 | VAN ZIJL Melvin | 70 |
| 76 | HOWSON Damien | 68 |
| 86 | ZEPUNTKE Ruben | 76 |
| 88 | FLAKSIS Andžs | 79 |
| 89 | HELVEN Sander | 74 |
| 90 | CORT Magnus | 68 |
| 98 | LINDEMAN Adrie | 76 |
| 106 | RYBAKOV Alexander | 65 |
| 108 | ATZORI Umberto | 72 |
| 109 | KREDER Wesley | 71 |
| 113 | SCHEP Peter | 80 |
| 116 | BEUKEBOOM Dion | 88 |
| 122 | FORKE Sebastian | 78 |
| 125 | BOEV Igor | 74 |