Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -1.1 * weight + 128
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -1.1 positions in the result.
Vermeltfoort
1
85 kgHowson
2
68 kgMulhern
3
75 kgAsselman
6
69 kgFlakemore
7
72 kgO'Shea
8
76 kgPhelan
9
73 kgZepuntke
12
76 kgvan Baarle
13
78 kgGate
14
71 kgGroenewegen
15
70 kgPfingsten
17
69 kgChaigneau
18
80 kgVink
21
73 kgStroetinga
23
69 kgGodrie
24
74 kgvan Goethem
25
77 kgCastelijns
28
70 kgTrusov
29
77 kgMccormick
30
72.5 kgvan der Weijst
31
63 kgvan der Lijke
34
61 kgKoning
35
77 kgTeunissen
36
73 kgZabel
37
81 kgBeukeboom
41
88 kgde Vries
43
70 kgVingerling
44
75 kgAvery
53
90 kgJanssens
56
74 kgHollanders
60
70 kgReinders
62
78.1 kgBeyer
70
75 kgvan Zandbeek
71
72 kgSegers
72
78 kgde Baat
74
66 kgQuast
78
67 kgTerpstra
80
64 kgSchreurs
82
69 kgWippert
84
75 kgAriesen
86
70 kgMortensen
88
70 kgvan Zijl
93
70 kgvan Ginneken
98
72 kgSchulting
105
70 kgKlostergaard
107
69 kgPieters
120
73 kg
1
85 kgHowson
2
68 kgMulhern
3
75 kgAsselman
6
69 kgFlakemore
7
72 kgO'Shea
8
76 kgPhelan
9
73 kgZepuntke
12
76 kgvan Baarle
13
78 kgGate
14
71 kgGroenewegen
15
70 kgPfingsten
17
69 kgChaigneau
18
80 kgVink
21
73 kgStroetinga
23
69 kgGodrie
24
74 kgvan Goethem
25
77 kgCastelijns
28
70 kgTrusov
29
77 kgMccormick
30
72.5 kgvan der Weijst
31
63 kgvan der Lijke
34
61 kgKoning
35
77 kgTeunissen
36
73 kgZabel
37
81 kgBeukeboom
41
88 kgde Vries
43
70 kgVingerling
44
75 kgAvery
53
90 kgJanssens
56
74 kgHollanders
60
70 kgReinders
62
78.1 kgBeyer
70
75 kgvan Zandbeek
71
72 kgSegers
72
78 kgde Baat
74
66 kgQuast
78
67 kgTerpstra
80
64 kgSchreurs
82
69 kgWippert
84
75 kgAriesen
86
70 kgMortensen
88
70 kgvan Zijl
93
70 kgvan Ginneken
98
72 kgSchulting
105
70 kgKlostergaard
107
69 kgPieters
120
73 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
90
61
1
120
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | VERMELTFOORT Coen | 85 |
| 2 | HOWSON Damien | 68 |
| 3 | MULHERN Mitchell | 75 |
| 6 | ASSELMAN Jesper | 69 |
| 7 | FLAKEMORE Campbell | 72 |
| 8 | O'SHEA Glenn | 76 |
| 9 | PHELAN Adam | 73 |
| 12 | ZEPUNTKE Ruben | 76 |
| 13 | VAN BAARLE Dylan | 78 |
| 14 | GATE Aaron | 71 |
| 15 | GROENEWEGEN Dylan | 70 |
| 17 | PFINGSTEN Christoph | 69 |
| 18 | CHAIGNEAU Robin | 80 |
| 21 | VINK Michael | 73 |
| 23 | STROETINGA Wim | 69 |
| 24 | GODRIE Stan | 74 |
| 25 | VAN GOETHEM Brian | 77 |
| 28 | CASTELIJNS Twan | 70 |
| 29 | TRUSOV Nikolay | 77 |
| 30 | MCCORMICK Hayden | 72.5 |
| 31 | VAN DER WEIJST Geert | 63 |
| 34 | VAN DER LIJKE Nick | 61 |
| 35 | KONING Peter | 77 |
| 36 | TEUNISSEN Mike | 73 |
| 37 | ZABEL Rick | 81 |
| 41 | BEUKEBOOM Dion | 88 |
| 43 | DE VRIES Berden | 70 |
| 44 | VINGERLING Michael | 75 |
| 53 | AVERY Clinton | 90 |
| 56 | JANSSENS Jimmy | 74 |
| 60 | HOLLANDERS Dries | 70 |
| 62 | REINDERS Elmar | 78.1 |
| 70 | BEYER Maximilian | 75 |
| 71 | VAN ZANDBEEK Ronan | 72 |
| 72 | SEGERS Joren | 78 |
| 74 | DE BAAT Arjen | 66 |
| 78 | QUAST Ole | 67 |
| 80 | TERPSTRA Mike | 64 |
| 82 | SCHREURS Hamish | 69 |
| 84 | WIPPERT Wouter | 75 |
| 86 | ARIESEN Johim | 70 |
| 88 | MORTENSEN Martin | 70 |
| 93 | VAN ZIJL Melvin | 70 |
| 98 | VAN GINNEKEN Sjoerd | 72 |
| 105 | SCHULTING Peter | 70 |
| 107 | KLOSTERGAARD Kasper | 69 |
| 120 | PIETERS Sibrecht | 73 |