Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = 0.3 * weight + 25
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses 0.3 positions in the result.
Stroetinga
2
69 kgTeunissen
3
73 kgWippert
4
75 kgvan der Weijst
5
63 kgGodrie
6
74 kgvan der Lijke
8
61 kgGate
9
71 kgTrusov
12
77 kgZepuntke
16
76 kgBeyer
17
75 kgde Baat
18
66 kgAriesen
19
70 kgAvery
20
90 kgCastelijns
21
70 kgQuast
25
67 kgGroenewegen
27
70 kgChaigneau
28
80 kgVermeltfoort
29
85 kgZabel
30
81 kgFlakemore
35
72 kgPhelan
37
73 kgVingerling
41
75 kgvan Baarle
52
78 kgKlostergaard
53
69 kgAsselman
56
69 kgReinders
57
78.1 kgKoning
59
77 kgde Vries
67
70 kgMccormick
68
72.5 kgO'Shea
69
76 kgMulhern
71
75 kgHowson
72
68 kgTerpstra
74
64 kgSegers
75
78 kgvan Ginneken
77
72 kgvan Goethem
80
77 kgVink
82
73 kgvan Zijl
85
70 kgSchulting
87
70 kgHollanders
96
70 kgPfingsten
98
69 kgBeukeboom
99
88 kgPieters
100
73 kgvan Zandbeek
103
72 kg
2
69 kgTeunissen
3
73 kgWippert
4
75 kgvan der Weijst
5
63 kgGodrie
6
74 kgvan der Lijke
8
61 kgGate
9
71 kgTrusov
12
77 kgZepuntke
16
76 kgBeyer
17
75 kgde Baat
18
66 kgAriesen
19
70 kgAvery
20
90 kgCastelijns
21
70 kgQuast
25
67 kgGroenewegen
27
70 kgChaigneau
28
80 kgVermeltfoort
29
85 kgZabel
30
81 kgFlakemore
35
72 kgPhelan
37
73 kgVingerling
41
75 kgvan Baarle
52
78 kgKlostergaard
53
69 kgAsselman
56
69 kgReinders
57
78.1 kgKoning
59
77 kgde Vries
67
70 kgMccormick
68
72.5 kgO'Shea
69
76 kgMulhern
71
75 kgHowson
72
68 kgTerpstra
74
64 kgSegers
75
78 kgvan Ginneken
77
72 kgvan Goethem
80
77 kgVink
82
73 kgvan Zijl
85
70 kgSchulting
87
70 kgHollanders
96
70 kgPfingsten
98
69 kgBeukeboom
99
88 kgPieters
100
73 kgvan Zandbeek
103
72 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
90
61
2
103
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | STROETINGA Wim | 69 |
| 3 | TEUNISSEN Mike | 73 |
| 4 | WIPPERT Wouter | 75 |
| 5 | VAN DER WEIJST Geert | 63 |
| 6 | GODRIE Stan | 74 |
| 8 | VAN DER LIJKE Nick | 61 |
| 9 | GATE Aaron | 71 |
| 12 | TRUSOV Nikolay | 77 |
| 16 | ZEPUNTKE Ruben | 76 |
| 17 | BEYER Maximilian | 75 |
| 18 | DE BAAT Arjen | 66 |
| 19 | ARIESEN Johim | 70 |
| 20 | AVERY Clinton | 90 |
| 21 | CASTELIJNS Twan | 70 |
| 25 | QUAST Ole | 67 |
| 27 | GROENEWEGEN Dylan | 70 |
| 28 | CHAIGNEAU Robin | 80 |
| 29 | VERMELTFOORT Coen | 85 |
| 30 | ZABEL Rick | 81 |
| 35 | FLAKEMORE Campbell | 72 |
| 37 | PHELAN Adam | 73 |
| 41 | VINGERLING Michael | 75 |
| 52 | VAN BAARLE Dylan | 78 |
| 53 | KLOSTERGAARD Kasper | 69 |
| 56 | ASSELMAN Jesper | 69 |
| 57 | REINDERS Elmar | 78.1 |
| 59 | KONING Peter | 77 |
| 67 | DE VRIES Berden | 70 |
| 68 | MCCORMICK Hayden | 72.5 |
| 69 | O'SHEA Glenn | 76 |
| 71 | MULHERN Mitchell | 75 |
| 72 | HOWSON Damien | 68 |
| 74 | TERPSTRA Mike | 64 |
| 75 | SEGERS Joren | 78 |
| 77 | VAN GINNEKEN Sjoerd | 72 |
| 80 | VAN GOETHEM Brian | 77 |
| 82 | VINK Michael | 73 |
| 85 | VAN ZIJL Melvin | 70 |
| 87 | SCHULTING Peter | 70 |
| 96 | HOLLANDERS Dries | 70 |
| 98 | PFINGSTEN Christoph | 69 |
| 99 | BEUKEBOOM Dion | 88 |
| 100 | PIETERS Sibrecht | 73 |
| 103 | VAN ZANDBEEK Ronan | 72 |