Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -1.3 * weight + 104
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -1.3 positions in the result.
Deignan
1
57 kgVos
2
58 kgLongo Borghini
3
59 kgBrennauer
4
63 kgBastianelli
5
60 kgNorsgaard
6
65 kgCordon-Ragot
8
60 kgCavalli
9
53 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
10
64 kgMajerus
11
56 kgThomas
12
58 kgPieters
14
58 kgKopecky
15
66 kgBeekhuis
17
58 kgKasper
18
59 kgMartins
19
61 kgJounier
20
58 kgBiannic
21
64 kgConfalonieri
22
56 kgRoy
23
66 kgJackson
24
63 kgCecchini
25
52 kgWood
26
59 kgDuval
27
53 kgHenderson
28
58 kgConsonni
30
59 kgvan Dijk
32
71 kgMackaij
33
57 kgMarkus
34
61 kgvan der Hulst
35
66 kgLach
36
59 kgVandenbulcke
42
60 kgBujak
43
63 kgKessler
44
60 kgSmulders
45
51 kgGutiérrez
46
60 kgPenton
47
55 kgGuarischi
49
57 kgChabbey
50
52 kgVigié
51
58 kgVerhulst-Wild
55
58 kgDemey
56
56 kgBalsamo
57
55 kgBarnes
59
52 kgGrossetête
60
60 kgParkinson
61
51 kg
1
57 kgVos
2
58 kgLongo Borghini
3
59 kgBrennauer
4
63 kgBastianelli
5
60 kgNorsgaard
6
65 kgCordon-Ragot
8
60 kgCavalli
9
53 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
10
64 kgMajerus
11
56 kgThomas
12
58 kgPieters
14
58 kgKopecky
15
66 kgBeekhuis
17
58 kgKasper
18
59 kgMartins
19
61 kgJounier
20
58 kgBiannic
21
64 kgConfalonieri
22
56 kgRoy
23
66 kgJackson
24
63 kgCecchini
25
52 kgWood
26
59 kgDuval
27
53 kgHenderson
28
58 kgConsonni
30
59 kgvan Dijk
32
71 kgMackaij
33
57 kgMarkus
34
61 kgvan der Hulst
35
66 kgLach
36
59 kgVandenbulcke
42
60 kgBujak
43
63 kgKessler
44
60 kgSmulders
45
51 kgGutiérrez
46
60 kgPenton
47
55 kgGuarischi
49
57 kgChabbey
50
52 kgVigié
51
58 kgVerhulst-Wild
55
58 kgDemey
56
56 kgBalsamo
57
55 kgBarnes
59
52 kgGrossetête
60
60 kgParkinson
61
51 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
71
51
1
61
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | DEIGNAN Elizabeth | 57 |
| 2 | VOS Marianne | 58 |
| 3 | LONGO BORGHINI Elisa | 59 |
| 4 | BRENNAUER Lisa | 63 |
| 5 | BASTIANELLI Marta | 60 |
| 6 | NORSGAARD Emma | 65 |
| 8 | CORDON-RAGOT Audrey | 60 |
| 9 | CAVALLI Marta | 53 |
| 10 | VAN DEN BROEK-BLAAK Chantal | 64 |
| 11 | MAJERUS Christine | 56 |
| 12 | THOMAS Leah | 58 |
| 14 | PIETERS Amy | 58 |
| 15 | KOPECKY Lotte | 66 |
| 17 | BEEKHUIS Teuntje | 58 |
| 18 | KASPER Romy | 59 |
| 19 | MARTINS Maria | 61 |
| 20 | JOUNIER Lucie | 58 |
| 21 | BIANNIC Aude | 64 |
| 22 | CONFALONIERI Maria Giulia | 56 |
| 23 | ROY Sarah | 66 |
| 24 | JACKSON Alison | 63 |
| 25 | CECCHINI Elena | 52 |
| 26 | WOOD Alice | 59 |
| 27 | DUVAL Eugénie | 53 |
| 28 | HENDERSON Anna | 58 |
| 30 | CONSONNI Chiara | 59 |
| 32 | VAN DIJK Ellen | 71 |
| 33 | MACKAIJ Floortje | 57 |
| 34 | MARKUS Riejanne | 61 |
| 35 | VAN DER HULST Amber | 66 |
| 36 | LACH Marta | 59 |
| 42 | VANDENBULCKE Jesse | 60 |
| 43 | BUJAK Eugenia | 63 |
| 44 | KESSLER Nina | 60 |
| 45 | SMULDERS Silke | 51 |
| 46 | GUTIÉRREZ Sheyla | 60 |
| 47 | PENTON Sara | 55 |
| 49 | GUARISCHI Barbara | 57 |
| 50 | CHABBEY Elise | 52 |
| 51 | VIGIÉ Margaux | 58 |
| 55 | VERHULST-WILD Gladys | 58 |
| 56 | DEMEY Valerie | 56 |
| 57 | BALSAMO Elisa | 55 |
| 59 | BARNES Hannah | 52 |
| 60 | GROSSETÊTE Maëlle | 60 |
| 61 | PARKINSON Abby-Mae | 51 |