Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = 1.6 * weight - 52
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses 1.6 positions in the result.
Deignan
2
57 kgDygert
3
66 kgKerbaol
6
57 kgBeekhuis
7
58 kgPaladin
10
59 kgHenderson
12
58 kgFournier
14
60 kgDuval
15
53 kgBrand
17
57 kgBerteau
18
57 kgZanardi
19
56 kgAchtereekte
20
60 kgTeutenberg
22
53 kgColes-Lyster
25
61 kgGrossetête
26
60 kgFortin
27
55 kgSmulders
28
51 kgAndersen
29
55 kgBarker
31
56 kgCopponi
32
55 kgGreenwood
33
60 kgTacey
34
62 kgConfalonieri
37
56 kgJounier
39
58 kgFahlin
40
63 kgKlein
43
61 kgConsonni
51
59 kgDideriksen
52
62 kgTrevisi
55
54 kgCollinelli
57
62 kgBarbieri
58
55 kgRoy
59
66 kgAlzini
60
64 kgKorevaar
63
59 kgPomares
64
63 kgCasagranda
65
58 kgLeech
66
72 kgPilote Fortin
69
55 kgRoberts
70
60 kgBaur
72
56 kgBuch
73
61 kgHayes
75
55 kgVitillo
83
51 kgLaurance
84
62 kgKarasiewicz
85
69 kgLewis
89
67 kg
2
57 kgDygert
3
66 kgKerbaol
6
57 kgBeekhuis
7
58 kgPaladin
10
59 kgHenderson
12
58 kgFournier
14
60 kgDuval
15
53 kgBrand
17
57 kgBerteau
18
57 kgZanardi
19
56 kgAchtereekte
20
60 kgTeutenberg
22
53 kgColes-Lyster
25
61 kgGrossetête
26
60 kgFortin
27
55 kgSmulders
28
51 kgAndersen
29
55 kgBarker
31
56 kgCopponi
32
55 kgGreenwood
33
60 kgTacey
34
62 kgConfalonieri
37
56 kgJounier
39
58 kgFahlin
40
63 kgKlein
43
61 kgConsonni
51
59 kgDideriksen
52
62 kgTrevisi
55
54 kgCollinelli
57
62 kgBarbieri
58
55 kgRoy
59
66 kgAlzini
60
64 kgKorevaar
63
59 kgPomares
64
63 kgCasagranda
65
58 kgLeech
66
72 kgPilote Fortin
69
55 kgRoberts
70
60 kgBaur
72
56 kgBuch
73
61 kgHayes
75
55 kgVitillo
83
51 kgLaurance
84
62 kgKarasiewicz
85
69 kgLewis
89
67 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
72
51
2
89
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | DEIGNAN Elizabeth | 57 |
| 3 | DYGERT Chloé | 66 |
| 6 | KERBAOL Cédrine | 57 |
| 7 | BEEKHUIS Teuntje | 58 |
| 10 | PALADIN Soraya | 59 |
| 12 | HENDERSON Anna | 58 |
| 14 | FOURNIER Roxane | 60 |
| 15 | DUVAL Eugénie | 53 |
| 17 | BRAND Lucinda | 57 |
| 18 | BERTEAU Victoire | 57 |
| 19 | ZANARDI Silvia | 56 |
| 20 | ACHTEREEKTE Carlijn | 60 |
| 22 | TEUTENBERG Lea Lin | 53 |
| 25 | COLES-LYSTER Maggie | 61 |
| 26 | GROSSETÊTE Maëlle | 60 |
| 27 | FORTIN Valentine | 55 |
| 28 | SMULDERS Silke | 51 |
| 29 | ANDERSEN Susanne | 55 |
| 31 | BARKER Elinor | 56 |
| 32 | COPPONI Clara | 55 |
| 33 | GREENWOOD Monica | 60 |
| 34 | TACEY April | 62 |
| 37 | CONFALONIERI Maria Giulia | 56 |
| 39 | JOUNIER Lucie | 58 |
| 40 | FAHLIN Emilia | 63 |
| 43 | KLEIN Lisa | 61 |
| 51 | CONSONNI Chiara | 59 |
| 52 | DIDERIKSEN Amalie | 62 |
| 55 | TREVISI Anna | 54 |
| 57 | COLLINELLI Sofia | 62 |
| 58 | BARBIERI Rachele | 55 |
| 59 | ROY Sarah | 66 |
| 60 | ALZINI Martina | 64 |
| 63 | KOREVAAR Jeanne | 59 |
| 64 | POMARES Cindy | 63 |
| 65 | CASAGRANDA Andrea | 58 |
| 66 | LEECH Madelaine | 72 |
| 69 | PILOTE FORTIN Gabrielle | 55 |
| 70 | ROBERTS Jessica | 60 |
| 72 | BAUR Caroline | 56 |
| 73 | BUCH Hannah | 61 |
| 75 | HAYES Connie | 55 |
| 83 | VITILLO Matilde | 51 |
| 84 | LAURANCE Typhaine | 62 |
| 85 | KARASIEWICZ Karolina | 69 |
| 89 | LEWIS Sophie | 67 |