Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = 0.4 * weight + 20
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses 0.4 positions in the result.
Dygert
1
66 kgDeignan
2
57 kgPaladin
3
59 kgHenderson
4
58 kgKerbaol
7
57 kgBeekhuis
10
58 kgAchtereekte
12
60 kgBerteau
13
57 kgBrand
16
57 kgFournier
18
60 kgTeutenberg
19
53 kgDuval
21
53 kgGrossetête
25
60 kgColes-Lyster
26
61 kgZanardi
27
56 kgBarker
28
56 kgJounier
30
58 kgTacey
31
62 kgGreenwood
32
60 kgBaur
35
56 kgCollinelli
36
62 kgFahlin
39
63 kgConfalonieri
40
56 kgBuch
42
61 kgKlein
45
61 kgKorevaar
46
59 kgPomares
55
63 kgCasagranda
56
58 kgCopponi
57
55 kgConsonni
59
59 kgAlzini
61
64 kgDideriksen
62
62 kgLeech
66
72 kgRoy
67
66 kgTrevisi
69
54 kgHayes
70
55 kgPilote Fortin
73
55 kgBarbieri
74
55 kgSmulders
75
51 kgRoberts
77
60 kgFortin
81
55 kgAndersen
83
55 kgKarasiewicz
84
69 kgLewis
88
67 kgVitillo
92
51 kgLaurance
94
62 kg
1
66 kgDeignan
2
57 kgPaladin
3
59 kgHenderson
4
58 kgKerbaol
7
57 kgBeekhuis
10
58 kgAchtereekte
12
60 kgBerteau
13
57 kgBrand
16
57 kgFournier
18
60 kgTeutenberg
19
53 kgDuval
21
53 kgGrossetête
25
60 kgColes-Lyster
26
61 kgZanardi
27
56 kgBarker
28
56 kgJounier
30
58 kgTacey
31
62 kgGreenwood
32
60 kgBaur
35
56 kgCollinelli
36
62 kgFahlin
39
63 kgConfalonieri
40
56 kgBuch
42
61 kgKlein
45
61 kgKorevaar
46
59 kgPomares
55
63 kgCasagranda
56
58 kgCopponi
57
55 kgConsonni
59
59 kgAlzini
61
64 kgDideriksen
62
62 kgLeech
66
72 kgRoy
67
66 kgTrevisi
69
54 kgHayes
70
55 kgPilote Fortin
73
55 kgBarbieri
74
55 kgSmulders
75
51 kgRoberts
77
60 kgFortin
81
55 kgAndersen
83
55 kgKarasiewicz
84
69 kgLewis
88
67 kgVitillo
92
51 kgLaurance
94
62 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
72
51
1
94
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | DYGERT Chloé | 66 |
| 2 | DEIGNAN Elizabeth | 57 |
| 3 | PALADIN Soraya | 59 |
| 4 | HENDERSON Anna | 58 |
| 7 | KERBAOL Cédrine | 57 |
| 10 | BEEKHUIS Teuntje | 58 |
| 12 | ACHTEREEKTE Carlijn | 60 |
| 13 | BERTEAU Victoire | 57 |
| 16 | BRAND Lucinda | 57 |
| 18 | FOURNIER Roxane | 60 |
| 19 | TEUTENBERG Lea Lin | 53 |
| 21 | DUVAL Eugénie | 53 |
| 25 | GROSSETÊTE Maëlle | 60 |
| 26 | COLES-LYSTER Maggie | 61 |
| 27 | ZANARDI Silvia | 56 |
| 28 | BARKER Elinor | 56 |
| 30 | JOUNIER Lucie | 58 |
| 31 | TACEY April | 62 |
| 32 | GREENWOOD Monica | 60 |
| 35 | BAUR Caroline | 56 |
| 36 | COLLINELLI Sofia | 62 |
| 39 | FAHLIN Emilia | 63 |
| 40 | CONFALONIERI Maria Giulia | 56 |
| 42 | BUCH Hannah | 61 |
| 45 | KLEIN Lisa | 61 |
| 46 | KOREVAAR Jeanne | 59 |
| 55 | POMARES Cindy | 63 |
| 56 | CASAGRANDA Andrea | 58 |
| 57 | COPPONI Clara | 55 |
| 59 | CONSONNI Chiara | 59 |
| 61 | ALZINI Martina | 64 |
| 62 | DIDERIKSEN Amalie | 62 |
| 66 | LEECH Madelaine | 72 |
| 67 | ROY Sarah | 66 |
| 69 | TREVISI Anna | 54 |
| 70 | HAYES Connie | 55 |
| 73 | PILOTE FORTIN Gabrielle | 55 |
| 74 | BARBIERI Rachele | 55 |
| 75 | SMULDERS Silke | 51 |
| 77 | ROBERTS Jessica | 60 |
| 81 | FORTIN Valentine | 55 |
| 83 | ANDERSEN Susanne | 55 |
| 84 | KARASIEWICZ Karolina | 69 |
| 88 | LEWIS Sophie | 67 |
| 92 | VITILLO Matilde | 51 |
| 94 | LAURANCE Typhaine | 62 |