Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -1.1 * weight + 98
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -1.1 positions in the result.
Arndt
1
59 kgArmstrong
2
58 kgNumainville
3
65 kgWild
4
75 kgVisser
5
59 kgvan Dijk
6
71 kgGunnewijk
7
67 kgMajerus
8
56 kgvan der Breggen
9
56 kgAmialiusik
10
53 kgFerrand-Prévot
11
53 kgJohansson
12
58 kgSmall
13
55 kgPolspoel
14
59 kgKupfernagel
16
68 kgCordon-Ragot
17
60 kgAntoshina
18
55 kgGuarnier
21
54 kgLongo Borghini
23
59 kgGuderzo
25
54 kgRamsden
26
62 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
27
64 kgZabelinskaya
29
52 kgCantele
31
58 kgStevens
32
55 kgSpratt
33
55 kgDeignan
34
57 kgDe Vocht
36
61 kgBaccaille
40
61 kgKirchmann
41
59 kgTeutenberg
42
64 kgHughes
45
72 kgHenrion
49
60 kgMartisova
51
64 kgBrand
56
57 kgMiller
57
52 kgHannes
58
51 kgKasper
60
59 kgFerrier-Bruneau
61
53 kgMartin
63
57 kgBatagelj
67
53 kgScandolara
68
52 kgAndruk
70
56 kg
1
59 kgArmstrong
2
58 kgNumainville
3
65 kgWild
4
75 kgVisser
5
59 kgvan Dijk
6
71 kgGunnewijk
7
67 kgMajerus
8
56 kgvan der Breggen
9
56 kgAmialiusik
10
53 kgFerrand-Prévot
11
53 kgJohansson
12
58 kgSmall
13
55 kgPolspoel
14
59 kgKupfernagel
16
68 kgCordon-Ragot
17
60 kgAntoshina
18
55 kgGuarnier
21
54 kgLongo Borghini
23
59 kgGuderzo
25
54 kgRamsden
26
62 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
27
64 kgZabelinskaya
29
52 kgCantele
31
58 kgStevens
32
55 kgSpratt
33
55 kgDeignan
34
57 kgDe Vocht
36
61 kgBaccaille
40
61 kgKirchmann
41
59 kgTeutenberg
42
64 kgHughes
45
72 kgHenrion
49
60 kgMartisova
51
64 kgBrand
56
57 kgMiller
57
52 kgHannes
58
51 kgKasper
60
59 kgFerrier-Bruneau
61
53 kgMartin
63
57 kgBatagelj
67
53 kgScandolara
68
52 kgAndruk
70
56 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
75
51
1
70
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ARNDT Judith | 59 |
| 2 | ARMSTRONG Kristin | 58 |
| 3 | NUMAINVILLE Joëlle | 65 |
| 4 | WILD Kirsten | 75 |
| 5 | VISSER Adrie | 59 |
| 6 | VAN DIJK Ellen | 71 |
| 7 | GUNNEWIJK Loes | 67 |
| 8 | MAJERUS Christine | 56 |
| 9 | VAN DER BREGGEN Anna | 56 |
| 10 | AMIALIUSIK Alena | 53 |
| 11 | FERRAND-PRÉVOT Pauline | 53 |
| 12 | JOHANSSON Emma | 58 |
| 13 | SMALL Carmen | 55 |
| 14 | POLSPOEL Maaike | 59 |
| 16 | KUPFERNAGEL Hanka | 68 |
| 17 | CORDON-RAGOT Audrey | 60 |
| 18 | ANTOSHINA Tatiana | 55 |
| 21 | GUARNIER Megan | 54 |
| 23 | LONGO BORGHINI Elisa | 59 |
| 25 | GUDERZO Tatiana | 54 |
| 26 | RAMSDEN Denise | 62 |
| 27 | VAN DEN BROEK-BLAAK Chantal | 64 |
| 29 | ZABELINSKAYA Olga | 52 |
| 31 | CANTELE Noemi | 58 |
| 32 | STEVENS Evelyn | 55 |
| 33 | SPRATT Amanda | 55 |
| 34 | DEIGNAN Elizabeth | 57 |
| 36 | DE VOCHT Liesbet | 61 |
| 40 | BACCAILLE Monia | 61 |
| 41 | KIRCHMANN Leah | 59 |
| 42 | TEUTENBERG Ina-Yoko | 64 |
| 45 | HUGHES Clara | 72 |
| 49 | HENRION Ludivine | 60 |
| 51 | MARTISOVA Julia | 64 |
| 56 | BRAND Lucinda | 57 |
| 57 | MILLER Amanda | 52 |
| 58 | HANNES Kaat | 51 |
| 60 | KASPER Romy | 59 |
| 61 | FERRIER-BRUNEAU Christel | 53 |
| 63 | MARTIN Lucy | 57 |
| 67 | BATAGELJ Polona | 53 |
| 68 | SCANDOLARA Valentina | 52 |
| 70 | ANDRUK Alona | 56 |