Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -0.1 * weight + 57
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -0.1 positions in the result.
Wild
1
75 kgVos
2
58 kgBronzini
3
54 kgJohansson
4
58 kgOlds
5
54 kgHosking
7
60 kgvan Vleuten
11
59 kgMustonen
12
58 kgNumainville
15
65 kgGilmore
16
56 kgBrand
20
57 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
23
64 kgRamsden
24
62 kgKessler
30
60 kgvan Dijk
34
71 kgFahlin
36
63 kgBrennauer
44
63 kgVillumsen
46
59 kgSlappendel
49
67 kgTeutenberg
51
64 kgBecker
61
64 kgHanselmann
62
55 kgDe Vocht
64
61 kgPieters
65
58 kgde Baat
69
56 kgKoedooder
71
69 kgEnsing
75
62 kgGunnewijk
97
67 kgHatteland Lima
106
65 kgSandig
116
62 kgMiller
118
52 kgKupfernagel
127
68 kgSmall
129
55 kgStevens
131
55 kg
1
75 kgVos
2
58 kgBronzini
3
54 kgJohansson
4
58 kgOlds
5
54 kgHosking
7
60 kgvan Vleuten
11
59 kgMustonen
12
58 kgNumainville
15
65 kgGilmore
16
56 kgBrand
20
57 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
23
64 kgRamsden
24
62 kgKessler
30
60 kgvan Dijk
34
71 kgFahlin
36
63 kgBrennauer
44
63 kgVillumsen
46
59 kgSlappendel
49
67 kgTeutenberg
51
64 kgBecker
61
64 kgHanselmann
62
55 kgDe Vocht
64
61 kgPieters
65
58 kgde Baat
69
56 kgKoedooder
71
69 kgEnsing
75
62 kgGunnewijk
97
67 kgHatteland Lima
106
65 kgSandig
116
62 kgMiller
118
52 kgKupfernagel
127
68 kgSmall
129
55 kgStevens
131
55 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
75
52
1
131
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | WILD Kirsten | 75 |
| 2 | VOS Marianne | 58 |
| 3 | BRONZINI Giorgia | 54 |
| 4 | JOHANSSON Emma | 58 |
| 5 | OLDS Shelley | 54 |
| 7 | HOSKING Chloe | 60 |
| 11 | VAN VLEUTEN Annemiek | 59 |
| 12 | MUSTONEN Sara | 58 |
| 15 | NUMAINVILLE Joëlle | 65 |
| 16 | GILMORE Rochelle | 56 |
| 20 | BRAND Lucinda | 57 |
| 23 | VAN DEN BROEK-BLAAK Chantal | 64 |
| 24 | RAMSDEN Denise | 62 |
| 30 | KESSLER Nina | 60 |
| 34 | VAN DIJK Ellen | 71 |
| 36 | FAHLIN Emilia | 63 |
| 44 | BRENNAUER Lisa | 63 |
| 46 | VILLUMSEN Linda | 59 |
| 49 | SLAPPENDEL Iris | 67 |
| 51 | TEUTENBERG Ina-Yoko | 64 |
| 61 | BECKER Charlotte | 64 |
| 62 | HANSELMANN Nicole | 55 |
| 64 | DE VOCHT Liesbet | 61 |
| 65 | PIETERS Amy | 58 |
| 69 | DE BAAT Kim | 56 |
| 71 | KOEDOODER Vera | 69 |
| 75 | ENSING Janneke | 62 |
| 97 | GUNNEWIJK Loes | 67 |
| 106 | HATTELAND LIMA Tone | 65 |
| 116 | SANDIG Madeleine | 62 |
| 118 | MILLER Amanda | 52 |
| 127 | KUPFERNAGEL Hanka | 68 |
| 129 | SMALL Carmen | 55 |
| 131 | STEVENS Evelyn | 55 |