Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -0.2 * weight + 51
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -0.2 positions in the result.
Vos
1
58 kgWild
2
75 kgTeutenberg
3
64 kgvan Vleuten
4
59 kgBronzini
5
54 kgAndruk
7
56 kgCooke
8
58 kgGilmore
9
56 kgNumainville
10
65 kgJohansson
14
58 kgHosking
15
60 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
17
64 kgGuarnier
19
54 kgArys
20
60 kgFrapporti
21
63 kgKasper
25
59 kgD'hoore
28
63 kgBrennauer
29
63 kgWilleit
30
54 kgKirchmann
35
59 kgHohl
38
55 kgConfalonieri
39
56 kgPieters
40
58 kgRamsden
42
62 kgLongo Borghini
44
59 kgBeveridge
45
55 kgBrand
46
57 kgDe Vocht
49
61 kgKessler
51
60 kgSmall
52
55 kgGunnewijk
53
67 kgEnsing
55
62 kgMustonen
56
58 kgKoedooder
59
69 kgSandig
60
62 kgVisser
61
59 kgCantele
62
58 kgVillumsen
64
59 kgNorman Leth
66
68 kgDe Groot
75
56 kgPolspoel
77
59 kgValsecchi
79
58 kgBastianelli
81
60 kgLichtenberg
82
52 kgHatteland Lima
93
65 kg
1
58 kgWild
2
75 kgTeutenberg
3
64 kgvan Vleuten
4
59 kgBronzini
5
54 kgAndruk
7
56 kgCooke
8
58 kgGilmore
9
56 kgNumainville
10
65 kgJohansson
14
58 kgHosking
15
60 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
17
64 kgGuarnier
19
54 kgArys
20
60 kgFrapporti
21
63 kgKasper
25
59 kgD'hoore
28
63 kgBrennauer
29
63 kgWilleit
30
54 kgKirchmann
35
59 kgHohl
38
55 kgConfalonieri
39
56 kgPieters
40
58 kgRamsden
42
62 kgLongo Borghini
44
59 kgBeveridge
45
55 kgBrand
46
57 kgDe Vocht
49
61 kgKessler
51
60 kgSmall
52
55 kgGunnewijk
53
67 kgEnsing
55
62 kgMustonen
56
58 kgKoedooder
59
69 kgSandig
60
62 kgVisser
61
59 kgCantele
62
58 kgVillumsen
64
59 kgNorman Leth
66
68 kgDe Groot
75
56 kgPolspoel
77
59 kgValsecchi
79
58 kgBastianelli
81
60 kgLichtenberg
82
52 kgHatteland Lima
93
65 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
75
52
1
93
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | VOS Marianne | 58 |
| 2 | WILD Kirsten | 75 |
| 3 | TEUTENBERG Ina-Yoko | 64 |
| 4 | VAN VLEUTEN Annemiek | 59 |
| 5 | BRONZINI Giorgia | 54 |
| 7 | ANDRUK Alona | 56 |
| 8 | COOKE Nicole | 58 |
| 9 | GILMORE Rochelle | 56 |
| 10 | NUMAINVILLE Joëlle | 65 |
| 14 | JOHANSSON Emma | 58 |
| 15 | HOSKING Chloe | 60 |
| 17 | VAN DEN BROEK-BLAAK Chantal | 64 |
| 19 | GUARNIER Megan | 54 |
| 20 | ARYS Evelyn | 60 |
| 21 | FRAPPORTI Simona | 63 |
| 25 | KASPER Romy | 59 |
| 28 | D'HOORE Jolien | 63 |
| 29 | BRENNAUER Lisa | 63 |
| 30 | WILLEIT Cherise | 54 |
| 35 | KIRCHMANN Leah | 59 |
| 38 | HOHL Jennifer | 55 |
| 39 | CONFALONIERI Maria Giulia | 56 |
| 40 | PIETERS Amy | 58 |
| 42 | RAMSDEN Denise | 62 |
| 44 | LONGO BORGHINI Elisa | 59 |
| 45 | BEVERIDGE Julie | 55 |
| 46 | BRAND Lucinda | 57 |
| 49 | DE VOCHT Liesbet | 61 |
| 51 | KESSLER Nina | 60 |
| 52 | SMALL Carmen | 55 |
| 53 | GUNNEWIJK Loes | 67 |
| 55 | ENSING Janneke | 62 |
| 56 | MUSTONEN Sara | 58 |
| 59 | KOEDOODER Vera | 69 |
| 60 | SANDIG Madeleine | 62 |
| 61 | VISSER Adrie | 59 |
| 62 | CANTELE Noemi | 58 |
| 64 | VILLUMSEN Linda | 59 |
| 66 | NORMAN LETH Julie | 68 |
| 75 | DE GROOT Robyn | 56 |
| 77 | POLSPOEL Maaike | 59 |
| 79 | VALSECCHI Silvia | 58 |
| 81 | BASTIANELLI Marta | 60 |
| 82 | LICHTENBERG Claudia | 52 |
| 93 | HATTELAND LIMA Tone | 65 |