Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -0.1 * weight + 45
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -0.1 positions in the result.
Wild
1
75 kgDeignan
2
57 kgEdmondson
4
66 kgvan Dijk
5
71 kgHoskins
6
64 kgOlds
7
54 kgHosking
8
60 kgPieters
10
58 kgvan Vleuten
11
59 kgMoberg
12
56 kgGunnewijk
19
67 kgJasinska
20
57 kgKasper
22
59 kgNorman Leth
25
68 kgConfalonieri
26
56 kgVisser
27
59 kgGuarnier
30
54 kgBrennauer
31
63 kgGuderzo
32
54 kgKessler
33
60 kgLichtenberg
34
52 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
35
64 kgSmall
39
55 kgSpratt
40
55 kgStultiens
42
58 kgMarche
43
58 kgDuyck
49
60 kgFahlin
50
63 kgArys
55
60 kgMiller
56
52 kgDe Vocht
58
61 kgElvin
59
63 kgSlappendel
60
67 kgKoster
61
56 kgHoogeboom
67
52 kgvan der Breggen
70
56 kgEnsing
73
62 kgHatteland Lima
76
65 kgKoedooder
77
69 kgKröger
80
77 kgStevens
82
55 kgRoy
90
66 kgPattaro
93
60 kgStephens
100
55 kg
1
75 kgDeignan
2
57 kgEdmondson
4
66 kgvan Dijk
5
71 kgHoskins
6
64 kgOlds
7
54 kgHosking
8
60 kgPieters
10
58 kgvan Vleuten
11
59 kgMoberg
12
56 kgGunnewijk
19
67 kgJasinska
20
57 kgKasper
22
59 kgNorman Leth
25
68 kgConfalonieri
26
56 kgVisser
27
59 kgGuarnier
30
54 kgBrennauer
31
63 kgGuderzo
32
54 kgKessler
33
60 kgLichtenberg
34
52 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
35
64 kgSmall
39
55 kgSpratt
40
55 kgStultiens
42
58 kgMarche
43
58 kgDuyck
49
60 kgFahlin
50
63 kgArys
55
60 kgMiller
56
52 kgDe Vocht
58
61 kgElvin
59
63 kgSlappendel
60
67 kgKoster
61
56 kgHoogeboom
67
52 kgvan der Breggen
70
56 kgEnsing
73
62 kgHatteland Lima
76
65 kgKoedooder
77
69 kgKröger
80
77 kgStevens
82
55 kgRoy
90
66 kgPattaro
93
60 kgStephens
100
55 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
77
52
1
100
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | WILD Kirsten | 75 |
| 2 | DEIGNAN Elizabeth | 57 |
| 4 | EDMONDSON Annette | 66 |
| 5 | VAN DIJK Ellen | 71 |
| 6 | HOSKINS Melissa | 64 |
| 7 | OLDS Shelley | 54 |
| 8 | HOSKING Chloe | 60 |
| 10 | PIETERS Amy | 58 |
| 11 | VAN VLEUTEN Annemiek | 59 |
| 12 | MOBERG Emilie | 56 |
| 19 | GUNNEWIJK Loes | 67 |
| 20 | JASINSKA Małgorzata | 57 |
| 22 | KASPER Romy | 59 |
| 25 | NORMAN LETH Julie | 68 |
| 26 | CONFALONIERI Maria Giulia | 56 |
| 27 | VISSER Adrie | 59 |
| 30 | GUARNIER Megan | 54 |
| 31 | BRENNAUER Lisa | 63 |
| 32 | GUDERZO Tatiana | 54 |
| 33 | KESSLER Nina | 60 |
| 34 | LICHTENBERG Claudia | 52 |
| 35 | VAN DEN BROEK-BLAAK Chantal | 64 |
| 39 | SMALL Carmen | 55 |
| 40 | SPRATT Amanda | 55 |
| 42 | STULTIENS Sabrina | 58 |
| 43 | MARCHE Shara | 58 |
| 49 | DUYCK Ann-Sophie | 60 |
| 50 | FAHLIN Emilia | 63 |
| 55 | ARYS Evelyn | 60 |
| 56 | MILLER Amanda | 52 |
| 58 | DE VOCHT Liesbet | 61 |
| 59 | ELVIN Gracie | 63 |
| 60 | SLAPPENDEL Iris | 67 |
| 61 | KOSTER Anouska | 56 |
| 67 | HOOGEBOOM Roos | 52 |
| 70 | VAN DER BREGGEN Anna | 56 |
| 73 | ENSING Janneke | 62 |
| 76 | HATTELAND LIMA Tone | 65 |
| 77 | KOEDOODER Vera | 69 |
| 80 | KRÖGER Mieke | 77 |
| 82 | STEVENS Evelyn | 55 |
| 90 | ROY Sarah | 66 |
| 93 | PATTARO Francesca | 60 |
| 100 | STEPHENS Lauren | 55 |