Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = 1.6 * weight - 62
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses 1.6 positions in the result.
Pieters
2
58 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
3
64 kgAmialiusik
4
53 kgKirchmann
5
59 kgvan Dijk
6
71 kgBrennauer
7
63 kgArzuffi
8
52 kgSolovey
9
56 kgCordon-Ragot
10
60 kgSpratt
11
55 kgvan der Breggen
12
56 kgCanuel
13
51 kgGuderzo
14
54 kgElvin
15
63 kgHannes
16
51 kgJohansson
18
58 kgEnsing
20
62 kgMarche
21
58 kgDideriksen
22
62 kgAllen
23
55 kgCecchini
26
52 kgHosking
27
60 kgKopecky
28
66 kgMajerus
29
56 kgDeignan
32
57 kgMarkus
35
61 kgFrapporti
36
63 kgAndersen
37
55 kgMoberg
38
56 kgRoy
42
66 kgKorevaar
43
59 kgMustonen
44
58 kgKoster
45
56 kgKessler
47
60 kgD'hoore
48
63 kgConfalonieri
49
56 kgAdegeest
52
57 kgBeckers
55
67 kgGuarischi
63
57 kgStijns
65
61 kgKitchen
67
60 kgKuijpers
71
73 kgKröger
72
77 kgHatteland Lima
73
65 kgHoffmann
77
62 kg
2
58 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
3
64 kgAmialiusik
4
53 kgKirchmann
5
59 kgvan Dijk
6
71 kgBrennauer
7
63 kgArzuffi
8
52 kgSolovey
9
56 kgCordon-Ragot
10
60 kgSpratt
11
55 kgvan der Breggen
12
56 kgCanuel
13
51 kgGuderzo
14
54 kgElvin
15
63 kgHannes
16
51 kgJohansson
18
58 kgEnsing
20
62 kgMarche
21
58 kgDideriksen
22
62 kgAllen
23
55 kgCecchini
26
52 kgHosking
27
60 kgKopecky
28
66 kgMajerus
29
56 kgDeignan
32
57 kgMarkus
35
61 kgFrapporti
36
63 kgAndersen
37
55 kgMoberg
38
56 kgRoy
42
66 kgKorevaar
43
59 kgMustonen
44
58 kgKoster
45
56 kgKessler
47
60 kgD'hoore
48
63 kgConfalonieri
49
56 kgAdegeest
52
57 kgBeckers
55
67 kgGuarischi
63
57 kgStijns
65
61 kgKitchen
67
60 kgKuijpers
71
73 kgKröger
72
77 kgHatteland Lima
73
65 kgHoffmann
77
62 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
77
51
2
77
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | PIETERS Amy | 58 |
| 3 | VAN DEN BROEK-BLAAK Chantal | 64 |
| 4 | AMIALIUSIK Alena | 53 |
| 5 | KIRCHMANN Leah | 59 |
| 6 | VAN DIJK Ellen | 71 |
| 7 | BRENNAUER Lisa | 63 |
| 8 | ARZUFFI Alice Maria | 52 |
| 9 | SOLOVEY Hanna | 56 |
| 10 | CORDON-RAGOT Audrey | 60 |
| 11 | SPRATT Amanda | 55 |
| 12 | VAN DER BREGGEN Anna | 56 |
| 13 | CANUEL Karol-Ann | 51 |
| 14 | GUDERZO Tatiana | 54 |
| 15 | ELVIN Gracie | 63 |
| 16 | HANNES Kaat | 51 |
| 18 | JOHANSSON Emma | 58 |
| 20 | ENSING Janneke | 62 |
| 21 | MARCHE Shara | 58 |
| 22 | DIDERIKSEN Amalie | 62 |
| 23 | ALLEN Jessica | 55 |
| 26 | CECCHINI Elena | 52 |
| 27 | HOSKING Chloe | 60 |
| 28 | KOPECKY Lotte | 66 |
| 29 | MAJERUS Christine | 56 |
| 32 | DEIGNAN Elizabeth | 57 |
| 35 | MARKUS Riejanne | 61 |
| 36 | FRAPPORTI Simona | 63 |
| 37 | ANDERSEN Susanne | 55 |
| 38 | MOBERG Emilie | 56 |
| 42 | ROY Sarah | 66 |
| 43 | KOREVAAR Jeanne | 59 |
| 44 | MUSTONEN Sara | 58 |
| 45 | KOSTER Anouska | 56 |
| 47 | KESSLER Nina | 60 |
| 48 | D'HOORE Jolien | 63 |
| 49 | CONFALONIERI Maria Giulia | 56 |
| 52 | ADEGEEST Loes | 57 |
| 55 | BECKERS Isabelle | 67 |
| 63 | GUARISCHI Barbara | 57 |
| 65 | STIJNS Kyara | 61 |
| 67 | KITCHEN Lauren | 60 |
| 71 | KUIJPERS Evy | 73 |
| 72 | KRÖGER Mieke | 77 |
| 73 | HATTELAND LIMA Tone | 65 |
| 77 | HOFFMANN Chantal | 62 |