Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -0.6 * weight + 82
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -0.6 positions in the result.
Wiebes
1
60 kgCordon-Ragot
3
60 kgJackson
4
63 kgDuval
5
53 kgPaladin
7
59 kgHenderson
9
58 kgKorevaar
10
59 kgKasper
14
59 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
18
64 kgSmulders
19
51 kgDronova-Balabolina
20
63 kgDe Wilde
24
62 kgDideriksen
25
62 kgBaker
27
66 kgHosking
29
60 kgAndersen
30
55 kgBujak
33
63 kgHarris
35
57 kgKlein
36
61 kgBaur
37
56 kgWood
38
59 kgCopponi
39
55 kgFahlin
40
63 kgGrossetête
41
60 kgSeitz
42
58 kgMarkus
46
61 kgSchweinberger
47
67 kgSpratt
51
55 kgCampbell
52
63 kgSanguineti
53
61 kgKirchmann
54
59 kgConsonni
56
59 kgFournier
58
60 kgGhekiere
60
52 kgKessler
61
60 kgCecchini
64
52 kgPirrone
65
63 kgAllen
68
55 kgCant
69
57 kgvan der Hulst
76
66 kgBarbieri
77
55 kgCouzens
79
59 kgVan de Velde
81
58 kgBarnes
82
52 kgvan der Molen
83
58 kgBuch
85
61 kgvan Neck
86
63 kg
1
60 kgCordon-Ragot
3
60 kgJackson
4
63 kgDuval
5
53 kgPaladin
7
59 kgHenderson
9
58 kgKorevaar
10
59 kgKasper
14
59 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
18
64 kgSmulders
19
51 kgDronova-Balabolina
20
63 kgDe Wilde
24
62 kgDideriksen
25
62 kgBaker
27
66 kgHosking
29
60 kgAndersen
30
55 kgBujak
33
63 kgHarris
35
57 kgKlein
36
61 kgBaur
37
56 kgWood
38
59 kgCopponi
39
55 kgFahlin
40
63 kgGrossetête
41
60 kgSeitz
42
58 kgMarkus
46
61 kgSchweinberger
47
67 kgSpratt
51
55 kgCampbell
52
63 kgSanguineti
53
61 kgKirchmann
54
59 kgConsonni
56
59 kgFournier
58
60 kgGhekiere
60
52 kgKessler
61
60 kgCecchini
64
52 kgPirrone
65
63 kgAllen
68
55 kgCant
69
57 kgvan der Hulst
76
66 kgBarbieri
77
55 kgCouzens
79
59 kgVan de Velde
81
58 kgBarnes
82
52 kgvan der Molen
83
58 kgBuch
85
61 kgvan Neck
86
63 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
67
51
1
86
# | Rider | Weight (KG) |
---|---|---|
1 | WIEBES Lorena | 60 |
3 | CORDON-RAGOT Audrey | 60 |
4 | JACKSON Alison | 63 |
5 | DUVAL Eugénie | 53 |
7 | PALADIN Soraya | 59 |
9 | HENDERSON Anna | 58 |
10 | KOREVAAR Jeanne | 59 |
14 | KASPER Romy | 59 |
18 | VAN DEN BROEK-BLAAK Chantal | 64 |
19 | SMULDERS Silke | 51 |
20 | DRONOVA-BALABOLINA Tamara | 63 |
24 | DE WILDE Julie | 62 |
25 | DIDERIKSEN Amalie | 62 |
27 | BAKER Georgia | 66 |
29 | HOSKING Chloe | 60 |
30 | ANDERSEN Susanne | 55 |
33 | BUJAK Eugenia | 63 |
35 | HARRIS Ella | 57 |
36 | KLEIN Lisa | 61 |
37 | BAUR Caroline | 56 |
38 | WOOD Alice | 59 |
39 | COPPONI Clara | 55 |
40 | FAHLIN Emilia | 63 |
41 | GROSSETÊTE Maëlle | 60 |
42 | SEITZ Aline | 58 |
46 | MARKUS Riejanne | 61 |
47 | SCHWEINBERGER Christina | 67 |
51 | SPRATT Amanda | 55 |
52 | CAMPBELL Teniel | 63 |
53 | SANGUINETI Ilaria | 61 |
54 | KIRCHMANN Leah | 59 |
56 | CONSONNI Chiara | 59 |
58 | FOURNIER Roxane | 60 |
60 | GHEKIERE Justine | 52 |
61 | KESSLER Nina | 60 |
64 | CECCHINI Elena | 52 |
65 | PIRRONE Elena | 63 |
68 | ALLEN Jessica | 55 |
69 | CANT Sanne | 57 |
76 | VAN DER HULST Amber | 66 |
77 | BARBIERI Rachele | 55 |
79 | COUZENS Millie | 59 |
81 | VAN DE VELDE Julie | 58 |
82 | BARNES Hannah | 52 |
83 | VAN DER MOLEN Yuli | 58 |
85 | BUCH Hannah | 61 |
86 | VAN NECK Melissa | 63 |