Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -0.4 * weight + 65
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -0.4 positions in the result.
Wiebes
1
60 kgBarbieri
5
55 kgDronova-Balabolina
7
63 kgDideriksen
8
62 kgSeitz
11
58 kgPaladin
12
59 kgConsonni
13
59 kgDuval
14
53 kgDe Wilde
15
62 kgJackson
16
63 kgBaur
17
56 kgCopponi
18
55 kgBujak
19
63 kgHenderson
20
58 kgCordon-Ragot
22
60 kgHarris
24
57 kgKorevaar
26
59 kgCampbell
28
63 kgKasper
30
59 kgCant
32
57 kgGrossetête
33
60 kgSanguineti
35
61 kgKessler
37
60 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
38
64 kgGhekiere
39
52 kgWood
42
59 kgBuch
47
61 kgPirrone
48
63 kgFournier
49
60 kgMarkus
52
61 kgSpratt
54
55 kgKlein
55
61 kgBaker
57
66 kgSchweinberger
58
67 kgKirchmann
59
59 kgSmulders
60
51 kgCecchini
66
52 kgHosking
68
60 kgvan Neck
69
63 kgVan de Velde
78
58 kgAllen
79
55 kgBarnes
80
52 kgvan der Molen
81
58 kgFahlin
84
63 kg
1
60 kgBarbieri
5
55 kgDronova-Balabolina
7
63 kgDideriksen
8
62 kgSeitz
11
58 kgPaladin
12
59 kgConsonni
13
59 kgDuval
14
53 kgDe Wilde
15
62 kgJackson
16
63 kgBaur
17
56 kgCopponi
18
55 kgBujak
19
63 kgHenderson
20
58 kgCordon-Ragot
22
60 kgHarris
24
57 kgKorevaar
26
59 kgCampbell
28
63 kgKasper
30
59 kgCant
32
57 kgGrossetête
33
60 kgSanguineti
35
61 kgKessler
37
60 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
38
64 kgGhekiere
39
52 kgWood
42
59 kgBuch
47
61 kgPirrone
48
63 kgFournier
49
60 kgMarkus
52
61 kgSpratt
54
55 kgKlein
55
61 kgBaker
57
66 kgSchweinberger
58
67 kgKirchmann
59
59 kgSmulders
60
51 kgCecchini
66
52 kgHosking
68
60 kgvan Neck
69
63 kgVan de Velde
78
58 kgAllen
79
55 kgBarnes
80
52 kgvan der Molen
81
58 kgFahlin
84
63 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
67
51
1
84
# | Rider | Weight (KG) |
---|---|---|
1 | WIEBES Lorena | 60 |
5 | BARBIERI Rachele | 55 |
7 | DRONOVA-BALABOLINA Tamara | 63 |
8 | DIDERIKSEN Amalie | 62 |
11 | SEITZ Aline | 58 |
12 | PALADIN Soraya | 59 |
13 | CONSONNI Chiara | 59 |
14 | DUVAL Eugénie | 53 |
15 | DE WILDE Julie | 62 |
16 | JACKSON Alison | 63 |
17 | BAUR Caroline | 56 |
18 | COPPONI Clara | 55 |
19 | BUJAK Eugenia | 63 |
20 | HENDERSON Anna | 58 |
22 | CORDON-RAGOT Audrey | 60 |
24 | HARRIS Ella | 57 |
26 | KOREVAAR Jeanne | 59 |
28 | CAMPBELL Teniel | 63 |
30 | KASPER Romy | 59 |
32 | CANT Sanne | 57 |
33 | GROSSETÊTE Maëlle | 60 |
35 | SANGUINETI Ilaria | 61 |
37 | KESSLER Nina | 60 |
38 | VAN DEN BROEK-BLAAK Chantal | 64 |
39 | GHEKIERE Justine | 52 |
42 | WOOD Alice | 59 |
47 | BUCH Hannah | 61 |
48 | PIRRONE Elena | 63 |
49 | FOURNIER Roxane | 60 |
52 | MARKUS Riejanne | 61 |
54 | SPRATT Amanda | 55 |
55 | KLEIN Lisa | 61 |
57 | BAKER Georgia | 66 |
58 | SCHWEINBERGER Christina | 67 |
59 | KIRCHMANN Leah | 59 |
60 | SMULDERS Silke | 51 |
66 | CECCHINI Elena | 52 |
68 | HOSKING Chloe | 60 |
69 | VAN NECK Melissa | 63 |
78 | VAN DE VELDE Julie | 58 |
79 | ALLEN Jessica | 55 |
80 | BARNES Hannah | 52 |
81 | VAN DER MOLEN Yuli | 58 |
84 | FAHLIN Emilia | 63 |