Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -1 * weight + 121
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -1 positions in the result.
Lodewyck
2
70 kgStauff
4
82 kgKluge
8
83 kgReimer
9
69 kgWyss
10
63 kgvan Winden
15
70 kgDegenkolb
16
82 kgJanorschke
17
78 kgSchoffmann
19
67 kgPfingsten
21
69 kgKlemme
23
72 kgGallopin
24
69 kgSummerhill
27
70 kgJenkins
29
63 kgBrändle
34
80 kgCieślik
35
65 kgGeschke
41
64 kgGretsch
42
69 kgPöll
45
60 kgO'Shea
47
76 kgBonnafond
48
68 kgVoß
49
66 kgWestmattelmann
50
75 kgCusin
51
65 kgNerz
54
67 kgKeizer
56
72 kgVermeltfoort
57
85 kgJones
58
64 kgDe Gendt
62
73 kgBoeckmans
64
76 kgVan Staeyen
70
62 kgKrizek
76
74 kgSinkeldam
81
77 kgMcEvoy
82
67 kgKittel
83
82 kgBellis
86
69 kgKennaugh
87
66 kgDowsett
88
75 kgMcNally
89
72 kgBobridge
91
65 kgWauters
92
66 kgCarlsen
94
68 kgKadri
95
66 kgBessy
96
69 kgVasylyuk
97
65 kgHesselbarth
99
65 kg
2
70 kgStauff
4
82 kgKluge
8
83 kgReimer
9
69 kgWyss
10
63 kgvan Winden
15
70 kgDegenkolb
16
82 kgJanorschke
17
78 kgSchoffmann
19
67 kgPfingsten
21
69 kgKlemme
23
72 kgGallopin
24
69 kgSummerhill
27
70 kgJenkins
29
63 kgBrändle
34
80 kgCieślik
35
65 kgGeschke
41
64 kgGretsch
42
69 kgPöll
45
60 kgO'Shea
47
76 kgBonnafond
48
68 kgVoß
49
66 kgWestmattelmann
50
75 kgCusin
51
65 kgNerz
54
67 kgKeizer
56
72 kgVermeltfoort
57
85 kgJones
58
64 kgDe Gendt
62
73 kgBoeckmans
64
76 kgVan Staeyen
70
62 kgKrizek
76
74 kgSinkeldam
81
77 kgMcEvoy
82
67 kgKittel
83
82 kgBellis
86
69 kgKennaugh
87
66 kgDowsett
88
75 kgMcNally
89
72 kgBobridge
91
65 kgWauters
92
66 kgCarlsen
94
68 kgKadri
95
66 kgBessy
96
69 kgVasylyuk
97
65 kgHesselbarth
99
65 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
85
60
2
99
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | LODEWYCK Klaas | 70 |
| 4 | STAUFF Andreas | 82 |
| 8 | KLUGE Roger | 83 |
| 9 | REIMER Martin | 69 |
| 10 | WYSS Marcel | 63 |
| 15 | VAN WINDEN Dennis | 70 |
| 16 | DEGENKOLB John | 82 |
| 17 | JANORSCHKE Grischa | 78 |
| 19 | SCHOFFMANN Martin | 67 |
| 21 | PFINGSTEN Christoph | 69 |
| 23 | KLEMME Dominic | 72 |
| 24 | GALLOPIN Tony | 69 |
| 27 | SUMMERHILL Daniel | 70 |
| 29 | JENKINS Max | 63 |
| 34 | BRÄNDLE Matthias | 80 |
| 35 | CIEŚLIK Paweł | 65 |
| 41 | GESCHKE Simon | 64 |
| 42 | GRETSCH Patrick | 69 |
| 45 | PÖLL Stefan | 60 |
| 47 | O'SHEA Glenn | 76 |
| 48 | BONNAFOND Guillaume | 68 |
| 49 | VOß Paul | 66 |
| 50 | WESTMATTELMANN Daniel | 75 |
| 51 | CUSIN Rémi | 65 |
| 54 | NERZ Dominik | 67 |
| 56 | KEIZER Martijn | 72 |
| 57 | VERMELTFOORT Coen | 85 |
| 58 | JONES Carter | 64 |
| 62 | DE GENDT Thomas | 73 |
| 64 | BOECKMANS Kris | 76 |
| 70 | VAN STAEYEN Michael | 62 |
| 76 | KRIZEK Matthias | 74 |
| 81 | SINKELDAM Ramon | 77 |
| 82 | MCEVOY Jonathan | 67 |
| 83 | KITTEL Marcel | 82 |
| 86 | BELLIS Jonathan | 69 |
| 87 | KENNAUGH Peter | 66 |
| 88 | DOWSETT Alex | 75 |
| 89 | MCNALLY Mark | 72 |
| 91 | BOBRIDGE Jack | 65 |
| 92 | WAUTERS Willem | 66 |
| 94 | CARLSEN Kirk | 68 |
| 95 | KADRI Blel | 66 |
| 96 | BESSY Cyril | 69 |
| 97 | VASYLYUK Andriy | 65 |
| 99 | HESSELBARTH David | 65 |