Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -0.6 * weight + 79
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -0.6 positions in the result.
Gretsch
1
69 kgGallopin
2
69 kgO'Shea
3
76 kgBobridge
4
65 kgWyss
5
63 kgKeizer
6
72 kgBrändle
7
80 kgPfingsten
8
69 kgReimer
9
69 kgGeschke
10
64 kgVoß
12
66 kgKennaugh
13
66 kgWestmattelmann
14
75 kgDegenkolb
15
82 kgKluge
18
83 kgKlemme
19
72 kgDowsett
20
75 kgBellis
21
69 kgBonnafond
22
68 kgCusin
24
65 kgBoeckmans
25
76 kgNerz
26
67 kgVermeltfoort
28
85 kgvan Winden
31
70 kgBessy
36
69 kgDe Gendt
40
73 kgLodewyck
43
70 kgCarlsen
45
68 kgWauters
47
66 kgVan Staeyen
51
62 kgSummerhill
52
70 kgCieślik
55
65 kgHesselbarth
57
65 kgMcEvoy
58
67 kgKittel
61
82 kgSinkeldam
63
77 kgJenkins
68
63 kgMcNally
69
72 kgJanorschke
70
78 kgKrizek
74
74 kgPöll
80
60 kgJones
81
64 kgStauff
82
82 kgSchoffmann
87
67 kgVasylyuk
91
65 kgKadri
96
66 kg
1
69 kgGallopin
2
69 kgO'Shea
3
76 kgBobridge
4
65 kgWyss
5
63 kgKeizer
6
72 kgBrändle
7
80 kgPfingsten
8
69 kgReimer
9
69 kgGeschke
10
64 kgVoß
12
66 kgKennaugh
13
66 kgWestmattelmann
14
75 kgDegenkolb
15
82 kgKluge
18
83 kgKlemme
19
72 kgDowsett
20
75 kgBellis
21
69 kgBonnafond
22
68 kgCusin
24
65 kgBoeckmans
25
76 kgNerz
26
67 kgVermeltfoort
28
85 kgvan Winden
31
70 kgBessy
36
69 kgDe Gendt
40
73 kgLodewyck
43
70 kgCarlsen
45
68 kgWauters
47
66 kgVan Staeyen
51
62 kgSummerhill
52
70 kgCieślik
55
65 kgHesselbarth
57
65 kgMcEvoy
58
67 kgKittel
61
82 kgSinkeldam
63
77 kgJenkins
68
63 kgMcNally
69
72 kgJanorschke
70
78 kgKrizek
74
74 kgPöll
80
60 kgJones
81
64 kgStauff
82
82 kgSchoffmann
87
67 kgVasylyuk
91
65 kgKadri
96
66 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
85
60
1
96
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | GRETSCH Patrick | 69 |
| 2 | GALLOPIN Tony | 69 |
| 3 | O'SHEA Glenn | 76 |
| 4 | BOBRIDGE Jack | 65 |
| 5 | WYSS Marcel | 63 |
| 6 | KEIZER Martijn | 72 |
| 7 | BRÄNDLE Matthias | 80 |
| 8 | PFINGSTEN Christoph | 69 |
| 9 | REIMER Martin | 69 |
| 10 | GESCHKE Simon | 64 |
| 12 | VOß Paul | 66 |
| 13 | KENNAUGH Peter | 66 |
| 14 | WESTMATTELMANN Daniel | 75 |
| 15 | DEGENKOLB John | 82 |
| 18 | KLUGE Roger | 83 |
| 19 | KLEMME Dominic | 72 |
| 20 | DOWSETT Alex | 75 |
| 21 | BELLIS Jonathan | 69 |
| 22 | BONNAFOND Guillaume | 68 |
| 24 | CUSIN Rémi | 65 |
| 25 | BOECKMANS Kris | 76 |
| 26 | NERZ Dominik | 67 |
| 28 | VERMELTFOORT Coen | 85 |
| 31 | VAN WINDEN Dennis | 70 |
| 36 | BESSY Cyril | 69 |
| 40 | DE GENDT Thomas | 73 |
| 43 | LODEWYCK Klaas | 70 |
| 45 | CARLSEN Kirk | 68 |
| 47 | WAUTERS Willem | 66 |
| 51 | VAN STAEYEN Michael | 62 |
| 52 | SUMMERHILL Daniel | 70 |
| 55 | CIEŚLIK Paweł | 65 |
| 57 | HESSELBARTH David | 65 |
| 58 | MCEVOY Jonathan | 67 |
| 61 | KITTEL Marcel | 82 |
| 63 | SINKELDAM Ramon | 77 |
| 68 | JENKINS Max | 63 |
| 69 | MCNALLY Mark | 72 |
| 70 | JANORSCHKE Grischa | 78 |
| 74 | KRIZEK Matthias | 74 |
| 80 | PÖLL Stefan | 60 |
| 81 | JONES Carter | 64 |
| 82 | STAUFF Andreas | 82 |
| 87 | SCHOFFMANN Martin | 67 |
| 91 | VASYLYUK Andriy | 65 |
| 96 | KADRI Blel | 66 |