Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = 2.6 * weight - 103
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses 2.6 positions in the result.
van Vleuten
1
59 kgKraak
3
52 kgLippert
4
56 kgBaril
6
56 kgBauernfeind
7
53 kgKastelijn
10
52 kgSteels
11
55 kgDronova-Balabolina
12
63 kgChabbey
16
52 kgStorrie
20
58 kgKoster
23
56 kgSierra
24
57 kgJaskulska
28
52 kgAmialiusik
29
53 kgLudwig
30
55 kgDeignan
33
57 kgMalcotti
34
52 kgDemey
36
56 kgWiebes
40
60 kgNorsgaard
43
65 kgHartmann
44
56 kgMajerus
45
56 kgStannard
46
55 kgSmulders
47
51 kgBarker
48
56 kgBalsamo
49
55 kgGrossetête
52
60 kgBertizzolo
53
54 kgCordon-Ragot
54
60 kgDoebel-Hickok
55
51 kgBoogaard
57
59 kgDuval
61
53 kgColes-Lyster
63
61 kgWilliams
67
66 kgFahlin
68
63 kgRoy
69
66 kgAchtereekte
71
60 kgPikulik
72
54 kgSanguineti
75
61 kgGuarischi
76
57 kgGigante
79
53 kgBeekhuis
80
58 kgWood
88
59 kgLorenzen
91
71 kgBeuling
94
65 kg
1
59 kgKraak
3
52 kgLippert
4
56 kgBaril
6
56 kgBauernfeind
7
53 kgKastelijn
10
52 kgSteels
11
55 kgDronova-Balabolina
12
63 kgChabbey
16
52 kgStorrie
20
58 kgKoster
23
56 kgSierra
24
57 kgJaskulska
28
52 kgAmialiusik
29
53 kgLudwig
30
55 kgDeignan
33
57 kgMalcotti
34
52 kgDemey
36
56 kgWiebes
40
60 kgNorsgaard
43
65 kgHartmann
44
56 kgMajerus
45
56 kgStannard
46
55 kgSmulders
47
51 kgBarker
48
56 kgBalsamo
49
55 kgGrossetête
52
60 kgBertizzolo
53
54 kgCordon-Ragot
54
60 kgDoebel-Hickok
55
51 kgBoogaard
57
59 kgDuval
61
53 kgColes-Lyster
63
61 kgWilliams
67
66 kgFahlin
68
63 kgRoy
69
66 kgAchtereekte
71
60 kgPikulik
72
54 kgSanguineti
75
61 kgGuarischi
76
57 kgGigante
79
53 kgBeekhuis
80
58 kgWood
88
59 kgLorenzen
91
71 kgBeuling
94
65 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
71
51
1
94
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | VAN VLEUTEN Annemiek | 59 |
| 3 | KRAAK Amber | 52 |
| 4 | LIPPERT Liane | 56 |
| 6 | BARIL Olivia | 56 |
| 7 | BAUERNFEIND Ricarda | 53 |
| 10 | KASTELIJN Yara | 52 |
| 11 | STEELS Claire | 55 |
| 12 | DRONOVA-BALABOLINA Tamara | 63 |
| 16 | CHABBEY Elise | 52 |
| 20 | STORRIE Becky | 58 |
| 23 | KOSTER Anouska | 56 |
| 24 | SIERRA Arlenis | 57 |
| 28 | JASKULSKA Marta | 52 |
| 29 | AMIALIUSIK Alena | 53 |
| 30 | LUDWIG Hannah | 55 |
| 33 | DEIGNAN Elizabeth | 57 |
| 34 | MALCOTTI Barbara | 52 |
| 36 | DEMEY Valerie | 56 |
| 40 | WIEBES Lorena | 60 |
| 43 | NORSGAARD Emma | 65 |
| 44 | HARTMANN Elena | 56 |
| 45 | MAJERUS Christine | 56 |
| 46 | STANNARD Elizabeth | 55 |
| 47 | SMULDERS Silke | 51 |
| 48 | BARKER Elinor | 56 |
| 49 | BALSAMO Elisa | 55 |
| 52 | GROSSETÊTE Maëlle | 60 |
| 53 | BERTIZZOLO Sofia | 54 |
| 54 | CORDON-RAGOT Audrey | 60 |
| 55 | DOEBEL-HICKOK Krista | 51 |
| 57 | BOOGAARD Maaike | 59 |
| 61 | DUVAL Eugénie | 53 |
| 63 | COLES-LYSTER Maggie | 61 |
| 67 | WILLIAMS Lily | 66 |
| 68 | FAHLIN Emilia | 63 |
| 69 | ROY Sarah | 66 |
| 71 | ACHTEREEKTE Carlijn | 60 |
| 72 | PIKULIK Daria | 54 |
| 75 | SANGUINETI Ilaria | 61 |
| 76 | GUARISCHI Barbara | 57 |
| 79 | GIGANTE Sarah | 53 |
| 80 | BEEKHUIS Teuntje | 58 |
| 88 | WOOD Alice | 59 |
| 91 | LORENZEN Christina Bragh | 71 |
| 94 | BEULING Femke | 65 |