Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = 2.8 * weight - 112
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses 2.8 positions in the result.
Consonni
3
59 kgPikulik
5
54 kgDideriksen
7
62 kgBeuling
11
65 kgDe Wilde
12
62 kgTruyen
13
55 kgVandenbulcke
19
60 kgVigié
24
58 kgAndersen
30
55 kgBroughton
42
60 kgVan Mechelen
43
61 kgConfalonieri
49
56 kgKuijpers
50
73 kgPeeters
56
54 kgLee
61
53 kgvan Bokhoven
69
51 kgSüßemilch
80
67 kgCordon-Ragot
94
60 kgSels
95
62 kgVan Loy
97
65 kgBolks
102
60 kgNorman Leth
105
68 kgLópez
113
67 kgDruyts
120
62 kgLewis
124
67 kg
3
59 kgPikulik
5
54 kgDideriksen
7
62 kgBeuling
11
65 kgDe Wilde
12
62 kgTruyen
13
55 kgVandenbulcke
19
60 kgVigié
24
58 kgAndersen
30
55 kgBroughton
42
60 kgVan Mechelen
43
61 kgConfalonieri
49
56 kgKuijpers
50
73 kgPeeters
56
54 kgLee
61
53 kgvan Bokhoven
69
51 kgSüßemilch
80
67 kgCordon-Ragot
94
60 kgSels
95
62 kgVan Loy
97
65 kgBolks
102
60 kgNorman Leth
105
68 kgLópez
113
67 kgDruyts
120
62 kgLewis
124
67 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
73
51
3
124
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | CONSONNI Chiara | 59 |
| 5 | PIKULIK Daria | 54 |
| 7 | DIDERIKSEN Amalie | 62 |
| 11 | BEULING Femke | 65 |
| 12 | DE WILDE Julie | 62 |
| 13 | TRUYEN Marthe | 55 |
| 19 | VANDENBULCKE Jesse | 60 |
| 24 | VIGIÉ Margaux | 58 |
| 30 | ANDERSEN Susanne | 55 |
| 42 | BROUGHTON Charlotte | 60 |
| 43 | VAN MECHELEN Gloria | 61 |
| 49 | CONFALONIERI Maria Giulia | 56 |
| 50 | KUIJPERS Evy | 73 |
| 56 | PEETERS Jinse | 54 |
| 61 | LEE Lucy | 53 |
| 69 | VAN BOKHOVEN Julia | 51 |
| 80 | SÜßEMILCH Laura | 67 |
| 94 | CORDON-RAGOT Audrey | 60 |
| 95 | SELS Loes | 62 |
| 97 | VAN LOY Ellen | 65 |
| 102 | BOLKS Florien | 60 |
| 105 | NORMAN LETH Julie | 68 |
| 113 | LÓPEZ Marga | 67 |
| 120 | DRUYTS Kelly | 62 |
| 124 | LEWIS Sophie | 67 |