Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -2 * weight + 169
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -2 positions in the result.
Edmondson
1
66 kgEnsing
2
62 kgBarker
3
56 kgFahlin
6
63 kgAndersen
11
55 kgKorevaar
12
59 kgRoberts
13
61 kgFournier
14
60 kgDruyts
15
62 kgVan Loy
18
65 kgTenniglo
19
64 kgRagazinskiene
23
58 kgKessler
24
60 kgBeckers
26
67 kgPersico
27
53 kgVandenbroucke
28
63 kgGafinovitz
29
52 kgPaladin
33
59 kgCant
35
57 kgTeruel
44
56 kgde Baat
45
56 kgMoonen
46
56 kgCastrique
48
63 kgRooijakkers
52
58 kgWood
54
59 kgHannes
57
51 kgVan Velzen
58
57 kgDemey
60
56 kgGuderzo
65
54 kgMustonen
66
58 kgTrevisi
70
54 kgPolspoel
74
59 kgSels
77
65 kgAllin
79
58 kgRodríguez
83
57 kgPeeters
85
54 kgPollicini
90
57 kgGonzález
91
51 kgHatteland Lima
92
65 kgVan Twisk
93
53 kgChard
95
68 kgDocx
103
52 kgvan Houtum
111
55 kgHoffmann
112
62 kgVos
127
58 kg
1
66 kgEnsing
2
62 kgBarker
3
56 kgFahlin
6
63 kgAndersen
11
55 kgKorevaar
12
59 kgRoberts
13
61 kgFournier
14
60 kgDruyts
15
62 kgVan Loy
18
65 kgTenniglo
19
64 kgRagazinskiene
23
58 kgKessler
24
60 kgBeckers
26
67 kgPersico
27
53 kgVandenbroucke
28
63 kgGafinovitz
29
52 kgPaladin
33
59 kgCant
35
57 kgTeruel
44
56 kgde Baat
45
56 kgMoonen
46
56 kgCastrique
48
63 kgRooijakkers
52
58 kgWood
54
59 kgHannes
57
51 kgVan Velzen
58
57 kgDemey
60
56 kgGuderzo
65
54 kgMustonen
66
58 kgTrevisi
70
54 kgPolspoel
74
59 kgSels
77
65 kgAllin
79
58 kgRodríguez
83
57 kgPeeters
85
54 kgPollicini
90
57 kgGonzález
91
51 kgHatteland Lima
92
65 kgVan Twisk
93
53 kgChard
95
68 kgDocx
103
52 kgvan Houtum
111
55 kgHoffmann
112
62 kgVos
127
58 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
68
51
1
127
# | Rider | Weight (KG) |
---|---|---|
1 | EDMONDSON Annette | 66 |
2 | ENSING Janneke | 62 |
3 | BARKER Elinor | 56 |
6 | FAHLIN Emilia | 63 |
11 | ANDERSEN Susanne | 55 |
12 | KOREVAAR Jeanne | 59 |
13 | ROBERTS Amy | 61 |
14 | FOURNIER Roxane | 60 |
15 | DRUYTS Kelly | 62 |
18 | VAN LOY Ellen | 65 |
19 | TENNIGLO Moniek | 64 |
23 | RAGAZINSKIENE Daiva | 58 |
24 | KESSLER Nina | 60 |
26 | BECKERS Isabelle | 67 |
27 | PERSICO Silvia | 53 |
28 | VANDENBROUCKE Saartje | 63 |
29 | GAFINOVITZ Rotem | 52 |
33 | PALADIN Soraya | 59 |
35 | CANT Sanne | 57 |
44 | TERUEL Alba | 56 |
45 | DE BAAT Kim | 56 |
46 | MOONEN Puck | 56 |
48 | CASTRIQUE Alana | 63 |
52 | ROOIJAKKERS Pauliena | 58 |
54 | WOOD Alice | 59 |
57 | HANNES Kaat | 51 |
58 | VAN VELZEN Bryony | 57 |
60 | DEMEY Valerie | 56 |
65 | GUDERZO Tatiana | 54 |
66 | MUSTONEN Sara | 58 |
70 | TREVISI Anna | 54 |
74 | POLSPOEL Maaike | 59 |
77 | SELS Loes | 65 |
79 | ALLIN Pauline | 58 |
83 | RODRÍGUEZ Gloria | 57 |
85 | PEETERS Jinse | 54 |
90 | POLLICINI Silvia | 57 |
91 | GONZÁLEZ Alicia | 51 |
92 | HATTELAND LIMA Tone | 65 |
93 | VAN TWISK Abigail | 53 |
95 | CHARD Megan | 68 |
103 | DOCX Mieke | 52 |
111 | VAN HOUTUM Céline | 55 |
112 | HOFFMANN Chantal | 62 |
127 | VOS Marianne | 58 |