Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = -0.8 * weight + 89
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses -0.8 positions in the result.
Kopecky
1
66 kgFerrand-Prévot
2
53 kgLippert
3
56 kgChabbey
7
52 kgvan Dijk
8
71 kgReusser
10
70 kgvan der Breggen
11
56 kgHenderson
12
58 kgPaternoster
14
53 kgWiebes
17
60 kgJackson
18
63 kgFerguson
19
55 kgBertizzolo
20
54 kgWilliams
21
66 kgGhekiere
24
52 kgBujak
26
63 kgKraak
28
52 kgCurinier
30
53 kgvan Agt
32
54 kgBrand
34
57 kgNorsgaard
35
65 kgJaskulska
39
52 kgVos
40
58 kgTruyen
42
55 kgVas
45
51 kgCouzens
50
59 kgMagner
51
57 kgVan Dam
55
58 kgBeekhuis
57
58 kgKorevaar
58
59 kgEdwards
60
59 kgBerton
65
59 kgKoster
67
56 kgDe Wilde
68
62 kgSkalniak-Sójka
70
54 kgVerhulst-Wild
71
58 kgBaril
76
56 kgManly
77
53 kgDemey
78
56 kgErić
81
53 kgCavalli
82
53 kgPersico
83
53 kgCecchini
84
52 kgGuazzini
85
65 kgPaladin
86
59 kgDygert
87
66 kg
1
66 kgFerrand-Prévot
2
53 kgLippert
3
56 kgChabbey
7
52 kgvan Dijk
8
71 kgReusser
10
70 kgvan der Breggen
11
56 kgHenderson
12
58 kgPaternoster
14
53 kgWiebes
17
60 kgJackson
18
63 kgFerguson
19
55 kgBertizzolo
20
54 kgWilliams
21
66 kgGhekiere
24
52 kgBujak
26
63 kgKraak
28
52 kgCurinier
30
53 kgvan Agt
32
54 kgBrand
34
57 kgNorsgaard
35
65 kgJaskulska
39
52 kgVos
40
58 kgTruyen
42
55 kgVas
45
51 kgCouzens
50
59 kgMagner
51
57 kgVan Dam
55
58 kgBeekhuis
57
58 kgKorevaar
58
59 kgEdwards
60
59 kgBerton
65
59 kgKoster
67
56 kgDe Wilde
68
62 kgSkalniak-Sójka
70
54 kgVerhulst-Wild
71
58 kgBaril
76
56 kgManly
77
53 kgDemey
78
56 kgErić
81
53 kgCavalli
82
53 kgPersico
83
53 kgCecchini
84
52 kgGuazzini
85
65 kgPaladin
86
59 kgDygert
87
66 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
71
51
1
87
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | KOPECKY Lotte | 66 |
| 2 | FERRAND-PRÉVOT Pauline | 53 |
| 3 | LIPPERT Liane | 56 |
| 7 | CHABBEY Elise | 52 |
| 8 | VAN DIJK Ellen | 71 |
| 10 | REUSSER Marlen | 70 |
| 11 | VAN DER BREGGEN Anna | 56 |
| 12 | HENDERSON Anna | 58 |
| 14 | PATERNOSTER Letizia | 53 |
| 17 | WIEBES Lorena | 60 |
| 18 | JACKSON Alison | 63 |
| 19 | FERGUSON Cat | 55 |
| 20 | BERTIZZOLO Sofia | 54 |
| 21 | WILLIAMS Lily | 66 |
| 24 | GHEKIERE Justine | 52 |
| 26 | BUJAK Eugenia | 63 |
| 28 | KRAAK Amber | 52 |
| 30 | CURINIER Léa | 53 |
| 32 | VAN AGT Eva | 54 |
| 34 | BRAND Lucinda | 57 |
| 35 | NORSGAARD Emma | 65 |
| 39 | JASKULSKA Marta | 52 |
| 40 | VOS Marianne | 58 |
| 42 | TRUYEN Marthe | 55 |
| 45 | VAS Blanka | 51 |
| 50 | COUZENS Millie | 59 |
| 51 | MAGNER Alexis | 57 |
| 55 | VAN DAM Sarah | 58 |
| 57 | BEEKHUIS Teuntje | 58 |
| 58 | KOREVAAR Jeanne | 59 |
| 60 | EDWARDS Ruth | 59 |
| 65 | BERTON Nina | 59 |
| 67 | KOSTER Anouska | 56 |
| 68 | DE WILDE Julie | 62 |
| 70 | SKALNIAK-SÓJKA Agnieszka | 54 |
| 71 | VERHULST-WILD Gladys | 58 |
| 76 | BARIL Olivia | 56 |
| 77 | MANLY Alexandra | 53 |
| 78 | DEMEY Valerie | 56 |
| 81 | ERIĆ Jelena | 53 |
| 82 | CAVALLI Marta | 53 |
| 83 | PERSICO Silvia | 53 |
| 84 | CECCHINI Elena | 52 |
| 85 | GUAZZINI Vittoria | 65 |
| 86 | PALADIN Soraya | 59 |
| 87 | DYGERT Chloé | 66 |