Regression line on weight and result
With regression analysis we can check if there is a relationship between a dependent (also called outcome variable) and an independent variable. In this statistic, the relationship between the weight of a rider and the result (outcome) is investigated.
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
The formula for the regression line on the riders in the result is as follows:
result = 1.3 * weight - 38
This means that on average for every extra kilogram weight a rider loses 1.3 positions in the result.
Vos
1
58 kgvan Vleuten
2
59 kgVisser
3
59 kgJohansson
4
58 kgVillumsen
5
59 kgGuarnier
7
54 kgFerrand-Prévot
8
53 kgArndt
10
59 kgCantele
13
58 kgLongo Borghini
14
59 kgFerrier-Bruneau
15
53 kgNumainville
16
65 kgMarche
17
58 kgNeylan
19
52 kgvan der Breggen
20
56 kgHenrion
21
60 kgDe Vocht
22
61 kgKirchmann
23
59 kgMajerus
24
56 kgSpratt
25
55 kgWilleit
28
54 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
30
64 kgBronzini
34
54 kgBatagelj
35
53 kgRamsden
36
62 kgSanchis
39
56 kgAndruk
40
56 kgGrassi
42
56 kgKupfernagel
44
68 kgScandolara
46
52 kgMustonen
50
58 kgDeignan
51
57 kgBaccaille
53
61 kgMartisova
55
64 kgKasper
56
59 kgPitel
63
52 kgKitchen
65
60 kgArys
67
60 kgPieters
68
58 kgBartelloni
74
63 kgFournier
76
60 kgMartin
79
57 kgPolspoel
80
59 kgGuarischi
88
57 kgHoffmann
91
62 kg
1
58 kgvan Vleuten
2
59 kgVisser
3
59 kgJohansson
4
58 kgVillumsen
5
59 kgGuarnier
7
54 kgFerrand-Prévot
8
53 kgArndt
10
59 kgCantele
13
58 kgLongo Borghini
14
59 kgFerrier-Bruneau
15
53 kgNumainville
16
65 kgMarche
17
58 kgNeylan
19
52 kgvan der Breggen
20
56 kgHenrion
21
60 kgDe Vocht
22
61 kgKirchmann
23
59 kgMajerus
24
56 kgSpratt
25
55 kgWilleit
28
54 kgvan den Broek-Blaak
30
64 kgBronzini
34
54 kgBatagelj
35
53 kgRamsden
36
62 kgSanchis
39
56 kgAndruk
40
56 kgGrassi
42
56 kgKupfernagel
44
68 kgScandolara
46
52 kgMustonen
50
58 kgDeignan
51
57 kgBaccaille
53
61 kgMartisova
55
64 kgKasper
56
59 kgPitel
63
52 kgKitchen
65
60 kgArys
67
60 kgPieters
68
58 kgBartelloni
74
63 kgFournier
76
60 kgMartin
79
57 kgPolspoel
80
59 kgGuarischi
88
57 kgHoffmann
91
62 kg
Weight (KG) →
Result →
68
52
1
91
| # | Rider | Weight (KG) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | VOS Marianne | 58 |
| 2 | VAN VLEUTEN Annemiek | 59 |
| 3 | VISSER Adrie | 59 |
| 4 | JOHANSSON Emma | 58 |
| 5 | VILLUMSEN Linda | 59 |
| 7 | GUARNIER Megan | 54 |
| 8 | FERRAND-PRÉVOT Pauline | 53 |
| 10 | ARNDT Judith | 59 |
| 13 | CANTELE Noemi | 58 |
| 14 | LONGO BORGHINI Elisa | 59 |
| 15 | FERRIER-BRUNEAU Christel | 53 |
| 16 | NUMAINVILLE Joëlle | 65 |
| 17 | MARCHE Shara | 58 |
| 19 | NEYLAN Rachel | 52 |
| 20 | VAN DER BREGGEN Anna | 56 |
| 21 | HENRION Ludivine | 60 |
| 22 | DE VOCHT Liesbet | 61 |
| 23 | KIRCHMANN Leah | 59 |
| 24 | MAJERUS Christine | 56 |
| 25 | SPRATT Amanda | 55 |
| 28 | WILLEIT Cherise | 54 |
| 30 | VAN DEN BROEK-BLAAK Chantal | 64 |
| 34 | BRONZINI Giorgia | 54 |
| 35 | BATAGELJ Polona | 53 |
| 36 | RAMSDEN Denise | 62 |
| 39 | SANCHIS Anna | 56 |
| 40 | ANDRUK Alona | 56 |
| 42 | GRASSI Giuseppina | 56 |
| 44 | KUPFERNAGEL Hanka | 68 |
| 46 | SCANDOLARA Valentina | 52 |
| 50 | MUSTONEN Sara | 58 |
| 51 | DEIGNAN Elizabeth | 57 |
| 53 | BACCAILLE Monia | 61 |
| 55 | MARTISOVA Julia | 64 |
| 56 | KASPER Romy | 59 |
| 63 | PITEL Edwige | 52 |
| 65 | KITCHEN Lauren | 60 |
| 67 | ARYS Evelyn | 60 |
| 68 | PIETERS Amy | 58 |
| 74 | BARTELLONI Beatrice | 63 |
| 76 | FOURNIER Roxane | 60 |
| 79 | MARTIN Lucy | 57 |
| 80 | POLSPOEL Maaike | 59 |
| 88 | GUARISCHI Barbara | 57 |
| 91 | HOFFMANN Chantal | 62 |